Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 29;66(2):213–230. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.08.003

Table 5 —

Standard automated perimetry (white stimulus on white background) and visual field deficit

Author(s) (year) No. of eyes (# subjects) Device Impaired visual field parameters (compared to the control group) No DR NPDR PDR
No DR NPDR PDR
Joltikov et al (2017)81 CN = 18 (n = 18)
No DR = 23 (n = 23)
Mild NPDR = 19 (n = 19)
Moderate NPDR = 15 (n = 15)		 HFA 24–2 SITA-standard strategy None ↑ PSD ↓ MD ↓ Foueal Threshold
Boynton et al (2015)27 CN = 15 (n = 15)
PDR = 15 (n = 15)
PRP = 30 (n = 30) 		HFA 10–2 SITA-standard and 60–4 HFA 10–2: ↑ PSD ↓ MD HFA 60–4: ↑ Total Threshold
Jackson et al (2012)77 CN = 18 (n = 18)
No DR = 23 (n = 23)
NPDR = 35 (n = 35)		 HFA 24–2 SITA-standard strategy None ↓ Mean Field Sensitiuity
Zico et al (2014)155 CN = 40 (n = 20)
No DR = 40 (n = 20)
Mild NPDR = 40 (n = 20)		 Twinfield Analyzer 24–2 SAP ↓ MD ↑ PSD ↓ MD
Parravano et al (2008)110 CN = 30 (n = 30)
No DR = 30 (n = 30)		 HFA 30–2 SITA standard strategy ↑ PSD ↓ MD
Lobefalo et al (1998)94 CN = 100 (n = 50)
No DR = 100 (n = 50)		 HFA 24–2 SITA-standard strategy None
Trick et al (1990)140 CN 70 (n = 35)
No DR = 74 (n = 37)
Mild to Moderate NPDR = 40 (n = 20)		 HFA C 30–2 strategy ↑ PSD ↓ MD ↑ PSD ↓ MD

CN, control; DR, diabetic retinopathy; NPDR, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PRP, pan-retinal photocoagulation.