Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;13(4):688. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040688

Table 3.

Grades of the quality of evidence from RCTs enrolled in meta-analysis after application of sensitivity test.

No of Studies Study Design Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication Bias Certainty
Overall survival in all 1 RCTs (assessed with: 2 HR)
7 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none ⨁⨁⨁⨁(HIGH)
Overall survival in 3 NSCLC RCTs (assessed with: HR)
4 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none ⨁⨁⨁⨁(HIGH)
Overall survival in 4 HNSCC RCTs (assessed with: HR)
3 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none ⨁⨁⨁⨁(HIGH)
Progression-free survival in all RCTs (assessed with: HR)
6 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none ⨁⨁⨁⨁(HIGH)
Progression-free survival in all RCTs (assessed with: HR)
3 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none ⨁⨁⨁⨁(HIGH)
Progression-free survival in HNSCC RCTs (assessed with: HR)
3 randomized trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none ⨁⨁⨁⨁(HIGH)

1 RCTs: randomized controlled trials, 2 HR: Hazard ratio, 3 NSCLC: non–small cell lung cancer, 4 HNSCC: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.