Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 6;13(4):651. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040651

Table 2.

Major clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers.

Disease Category Clinical Study (Phase) References Interventions Inclusion Criteria Major Findings Pertinent to MSI
Solid tumor KEYNOTE-28 (1b) [33] Single-arm P PD-L1 positive, previously treated Higher RR in MSI-H tumors vs. non-MSI-H tumors
KEYNOTE-158 (2) [34,35] Single-arm P Previously treated Higher RR in MSI-H or TMB-H tumors vs. non-MSI-H tumors
GC KEYNOTE-12 GC cohort (1b) [36] Single-arm P PD-L1 positive, previously treated Higher RR in MSI-H tumors vs. non-MSI-H tumors
KEYNOTE-59 (2) [37] Single-arm P Progression after ≥2 prior lines of therapy
including platinum and fluoropyrimidine
Improved RR and survival in MSI-H tumors vs. non-MSI-H tumors
KEYNOTE-61 (3) [38] P vs. paclitaxel Progression after first-line therapy with
platinum and fluoropyrimidine
P improved RR and survival vs. paclitaxel in MSI-H tumors
KEYNOTE-62 (3) [39] P vs. P + C vs. C CPS ≥1, HER2 negative and treatment-naive P improved RR and survival vs. C alone in MSI-H tumors
CheckMate032 (1/2) [40] N vs. N + I Previously treated Higher RRs in MSI-H tumors vs. non-MSI-H tumors
ATTRACTION-2 (3) [41] N vs. placebo Previously treated with ≥2 prior lines of therapy N/A
ATTRACTION-4 (2/3) [42] N + C vs. placebo + C HER2 negative, treatment-naive N/A
CheckMate649 (3) [43] N + C vs. N + I vs. C HER2 negative, treatment-naive N/A
EAC and ESCC KEYNOTE-180 (2) [44] Single-arm P Progression after ≥2 prior lines of therapy Only one patient had an MSI-H tumor but did not respond to P
KEYNOTE-181 (3) [45] P vs. C Progression after first-line therapy NA
KEYNOTE-590 (3) [46] P + C vs. placebo + C Treatment-naive NA
ESCC ATTRACTION-1 (2) [47] Single-arm N Refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine-, platinum- or taxane-based C NA
ATTRACTION-3 (3) [48] N vs. C Refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine NA
SBA ZEBRA (2) [49] Single-arm P Previously treated Higher RR in MSI-H tumors vs. non-MSI-H tumors
AC NCI9673 (2) [50] N vs. N + I Previously treated NA
HCC KEYNOTE-224 (2) [51] Single-arm P Refractory or intolerant to sorafenib NA
KEYNOTE-240 (3) [52] P vs. placebo Refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy with sorafenib NA
CheckMate040 (1/2) [53,54,55] N vs. N + I Previously treated with sorafenib NA
CheckMate459 (3) [56] N vs. sorafenib Treatment-naive NA
IMbrave150 (3) [57] A + B vs. sorafenib Treatment-naive NA
BTC NCT02829918 (2) [58] Single-arm N Progression after 1–3 prior lines of therapy All responders had pMMR tumors
NCT02923934 (2) [59] Single-arm N + I Prior therapy allowed All responders had MSS/MSI-L tumors
PDAC NCT02558894 (2) [60] D vs. D + T Progression after first-line therapy with fluorouracil or gemcitabine One out of three responders had MSI-H tumor with germline dMMR
GI NET DART SWOG 1609 (2) [61] Single-arm N + I Progression after ≥1 prior line of therapy NA
NCT03074513 (2) [62] Single-arm A + B Prior therapy allowed NA

Abbreviations: disease category—GC, gastric cancer; EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; SBA, small bowel adenocarcinoma; AC, anal cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; BTC, biliary tract cancer; PDAC, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; GI NET, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor; interventions—P, pembrolizumab; C, chemotherapy; N, nivolumab; I, ipilimumab; A, atezolizumab; B, bevacizumab; D, durvalumab; T, tremelimumab; results—RR, response rate; NA, not available.