Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;13(2):581. doi: 10.3390/nu13020581

Table 7.

Body composition assessment of two groups of the study.

SYN LUX
T0 T1 p-Value
(T0 vs. T1)
T2 p-Value
(T1 vs. T2)
T0 T1 p-Value
(T0 vs. T1)
T2 p-Value
(T1 vs. T2)
Weight (kg) 79.1 ± 14.1 78.8 ± 13.8 ns # 78.4 ± 13.2 ns # 75.8 ± 15.8 75.6 ± 15.5 ns # 76.6 ± 15.0 ns #
BMI (kg/m2) 28.9 ± 3.7 28.8 ± 3.4 ns # 28.7 ± 3.7 ns # 27.5 ± 5.9 27.4 ± 5.8 ns # 27.8 ± 5.8 ns #
Waist to hip ratio 0.93 ± 0.07 0.92 ± 0.07 ns # 0.92 ± 0.06 ns # 0.96 ± 0.09 0.95 ± 0.09 ns # 0.95 ± 0.8 ns #
Resistance (ohm) 480.4 ± 87.3 450.8 ± 79.1 ns # 472.8 ± 96.9 ns # 498.7 ± 81.0 486.2 ± 98.2 ns # 496.0 ± 74.5 ns #
Reactance (ohm) 39.3 ± 10.8 42.3 ± 12.3 0.0391 # 41.9 ± 11.3 ns # 41.8 ± 12.1 40.2 ± 10.0 ns # 41.8 ± 8.7 ns #
Phase angle (°) 4.6 ± 1.5 5.3 ± 2.2 ns # 4.8 ± 1.5 ns # 4.9 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 0.7 ns # 4.9 ± 0.5 ns #
TBW (%) 52.8 ± 6.1 55.1 ± 5.9 0.0465 # 53.2 ± 6.3 ns # 56.3 ± 7.4 60.8 ± 8.3 0.0033 # 54.4 ± 7.4 0.0301 #
ICW (%) 46.8 ± 7.2 49.9 ± 8.7 0.0058 # 47.0 ± 9.0 ns # 48.5 ± 5.0 49.5 ± 6.3 ns # 45.1 ± 14.4 ns #
ECW (%) 53.2 ± 7.2 50.1 ± 8.7 0.0058 # 53.0 ± 8.8 ns # 51.5 ± 3.1 50.5 ± 3.5 ns # 54.9 ± 3.0 ns #
FM (%) 34.4 ± 8.2 31.5 ± 8.2 ns # 32.6 ± 8.0 ns # 28.6 ± 9.6 22.2 ± 10.1 ns # 26.5 ± 8.5 ns #
FFM (%) 65.6 ± 7.6 68.5 ± 8.2 ns # 67.4 ± 7.9 ns # 71.4 ± 9.6 77.8 ± 10.5 ns # 73.5 ± 9.9 ns #
MM (%) 38.3 ± 6.5 41.6 ± 7.2 0.0198 # 40.7 ± 7.5 ns # 43.9 ± 6.7 45.5 ± 5.9 ns # 44.3 ± 706 ns #
BCMI (kg/m2) 9.1 ± 2.7 10.2 ± 3.6 0.0230 # 9.1 ± 2.9 0.0296 # 8.9 ± 1.7 9.7 ± 2.3 ns # 8.3 ± 2.9 ns #

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; # for the comparison of each parameter we applied test: t-test for paired data; values of p ≤ 0.05 are considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: LUX, Luxolio; SYN, Synergy; BMI, body mass index; TBW, total body water; ICW, intra cell water; ECW, extra cell water, FM, fat mass; FFM, fat free mass; MM, muscle mass; BCMI, body cellular mass index.