Table 4.

Comparison of the sensing performance found in this work with similar non-enzymatic glucose sensors.

Electrode Material	Linear Range (μM)	Detection Limit (μM)	Analytical Technique	Reference
Ni(II)-CP/C60	10 to 3 × 103	4.3	Amp	[66]
Mucilage-AgNPs/GC	10 to 2.2 × 103	10	SWV	[67]
Net-Co3(PO4)2/NG	0.05 to 2 × 103	1	Amp	[68]
ZnO/CeO2 whisker	0.5 to 300	0.22	DPV	[69]
Au@Cu2O	50 to 2 × 103	18	CV	[70]
HLTH/NF	15 to 8 × 103	1.49	Amp	[71]
Au-TiO2 NTs	50 to 3 × 103	50	CV	[72]
CuO nanodisks	2 to 2.5 × 103	0.2	Amp	[73]
Cu0.04Zn0.96O	10−3 to 100	7 × 10−4	DPV	This work

Ni(II)-CP/C60: Ni(II)-coordination polymer and fullerene (C60), Amp: amperometry, AgNPs: silver NPs, GC: glassy carbon, SWV: squarewave voltammetry, Net-Co₃(PO₄)₂/NG: networked cobaltous phosphate decorated with nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide, DPV: differential pulse voltammetry, CeO₂: cerium oxide, Cu₂O: cuprous oxide, AuNPs: gold NPs, HLTH/NF: hollow triple-layered hydroxide modified nickel foam, Au-TiO₂NTs: gold layers deposited onto TiO₂ nanotubes, CuO: copper oxide.