Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;5(11):1330–1339. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0769-y

Extended Data Fig. 4. The antiviral effect of LY6E is independent of proteolytic cleavage of CoV spike protein.

Extended Data Fig. 4

a, Schematic depiction of cell entry routes of CoVs and intervention by selected compounds. b-c, LY6E or empty control-expressing Huh7 cells naïve for (b) or ectopically overexpressing TMPRSS2 (c) were pre-treated with the indicated compounds before infection with HCoV-229E-Rluc. d, Schematic depiction of the CoV spike (S) protein containing the subunits S1 and S2. Arrows indicate the S1/S2’ cleavage site, a proposed cleavage site for cathepsin L (CTSL’) and the S2’ cleavage site. Amino acid exchanges disrupting the respective cleavage sites are depicted in red. e, Western blot of S cleavage in LY6E or empty control-expressing Huh7 cells transfected with a plasmid encoding for MERS-CoV S protein (S0= uncleaved, S2= S2 subunit). f, MERS CoV S cleavage was analyzed by quantification of S0 and S2 bands. g, LY6E or empty control-expressing Huh7 cells inoculated with CoV-pseudoparticles (pp) harboring MERS-CoV S WT or MERS-CoV S proteins containing various cleavage site mutations. Data represent mean of independent biological replicates, n=3 (b), n=3 (c), n=3 (e), n=3 (f), n=5 (g). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons (b-c, g) or two-tailed unpaired student’s t-test with Welch’s correction (f). Error bars: SD. P values (left-to-right): b, **** p=4.4 × 10−9, p=1.6 × 10−9, p=6.2 × 10−9, p=7.5 × 10−10, p=3.0 × 10−10, * p=0.0179; c, *** p=0.0007, p=0.0005, p=0.0006, **** p=4.8 × 10−8, p=1.8 × 10-8.