Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 1;55(4):e27–e36. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001410

Table 3:

Studies clinical outcomes. eFTR: Endoscopic full-thickness resection, N/A: Not Applicable.

Study Procedure Time (Minutes) Complete Resection (R0) Rate Technical Success Rate eFTR Resection Rate Mean Diameter of Resected Specimen (mm) Complications Surgery secondary to complication Technical failure OTSC Fate Hospital Stay (Days) Follow up Recurrence
Aepli P et al., 201718 63 (mean) 29/33 (87.9%) 29/33 (87.9%) 25/31 (80.6%) 27.0 Minor bleeding (2), Major bleeding (1), Perforation (1) N/A Not reachable lesions (1), Snare malfunction (3) Not reported 3.1 (mean) Based on histologic type of the resected tissue Not reported
Andrisani et al.,20186 45 (mean) 99/110 (90%) 103/114 (90.3%) 100/110 (90.9%) 20.0 Traumatic wall injury (4), Stenosis after the deployment of the clip (1), Appendicitis (1), Perforation (1), Postpolypectomy syndrome (1), Tenesmus and perineal pain (2), Major bleeding (1) 2 Snare malfunction (12), Not reachable lesions (4) Spontaneously fallen off (100), In place (10), Removed Endoscopically (2) 91/110 (82.7%) stayed one day, 19/110 (17.3%) as outpatient 3 months in all pts Residual/recurrent disease in only 7 pts on 3-month follow-up
Schmidt et al., 20185 50 (median) 139/181 (76.8%) 162/181 (89.5%) 162/181 (89.5%) Not reported Minor bleeding (4),Appendicitis (3), Postpolypectomy (3), Recurrent Abdominal pain (1), Perforation (6), Enterocolonic fistula (1) 4 Snare malfunction (13) Spontaneously fallen off (106/154), In place (48), Enodscopically removed (10) 4 (median) 3 months 154/181 19/154
Valli et al., 201819 60 (Median) 46/58 (79.3%) 58/60 (96.7%) 51/58 (87.9%) 24.0 Minor bleeding (2), Appendicitis (1), Incomplete OTSC deployment (1). N/A Not reachable lesions (2), Snare malfunction (4) Spont. Fallen off (26), In place (4), Removed endoscopically (3), unknown (24) Not reported Mean 16 months No recurrence reported.
Vitali et al., 201820 68 (mean) 10/13 (76.9%) 13/13 (100%) Not reported 17.0 Postpolypectomy (2) N/A Snare malfunction (1) N/A 2.5 (mean) 8.7±7.2 months 3/11
Van der Spek et al., 201817 Not reported 40/50 (80%) 45/51 (88.2%) 43/50 (86%) 21.0 Minor bleeding (4), Major bleeding (1), Perforation (1), Postprocedural cardiac event (1), urinary retention (1) N/A N/A N/A N/A 42/48 130 days (+/−11 days) 5/42
Rahman et al., 201622 40 (Median) 8/9 (88.9%) 9/11 (81.8%) 9/9 (100%) 22.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Ichkhanian et al., 201921 63 (mean) 56/63 (88.9%) 67/79 (84.8%) N/A N/A Appendicitis (1), Perforation (1), Minor bleeding (3) 2 Snare malfunction (3), clip closure (1),, Not reachable lesion (1) N/A 0.4 N/A N/A
Velegraki el al., 201923 36.9 (mean) 14/17 (82.3%) 14/17 (82.3%) N/A N/A Minor bleeding (1), Appendicitis (1), Recurrent abdominal pain of unknown cause (1) 1 Not reachable lesion (2), Macroscopically incomplete resection (1) N/A 1–3 days 6/17 3-month follow up No recurrence both macro and microscopically