Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;10(4):729. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040729

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of different risk stratifiers’ cut-off values with regard to identification of subjects with screen-detected AF, as confirmed by 12-lead ECG.

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
% % % %
Age ≥ 65 (1848 [65.7%]) 96.4 24.2 2.9 99.8
Age ≥ 75 (691 [24.6%]) 50 76 4.1 98.7
CHA2DS2VASc > 0 in males and >1 in females or
CHA2DS2VA > 0 (2163 [76.9%])
98.2 23.6 2.5 99.8
CHA2DS2VASc > 1 in males and >2 in females or CHA2DS2VA > 1 (1510 [53.7%]) 92.9 47.1 3.4 99.7
CHA2DS2VASc > 2 (1185 [42.1%]) 80.4 58.7 3.8 99.3
CHA2DS2VASc > 3 (530 [18.8%]) 42.9 81.7 4.5 98.6
CHA2DS2VA > 2 (781 [27.8%]) 73.2 73.2 5.2 99.3
CHADS2 > 0 (1708 [60.7%]) 92.9 40 3 99.6
CHADS2 > 1 (722 [25.7%]) 69.6 75.2 5.4 99.2
CHADS2 > 2 (196 [7%]) 23.2 93.4 6.6 98.4
CHADS265 > 0 (2150 [76.4%]) 98.2 24 2.6 99.8
CHADS265 > 1 (1255 [44.6%]) 89.3 56.3 4 99.6
CHADS265 > 2 (336 [11.9%]) 37.5 88.6 6.3 98.6

Legend: PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value.