Table 2.
Comparison of proposed method vs. monocular and stereo-based VISO2 and MagicVO. • t: average translation drift (%) on length of 100–800 m. • r: average rotation drift (°/100 m) on length of 100–800 m.
| Seq. | Proposed | Proposed (LSTM) | VISO2_M | VISO2_S | MagicVO | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t (%) | r (°) | t (%) | r (°) | t (%) | r (°) | t (%) | r (°) | t (%) | r (°) | |
| 03 | 4.85 | 2.54 | 9.82 | 3.64 | 10.57 | 1.73 | 2.94 | 1.09 | 4.95 | 2.44 |
| 05 | 2.89 | 1.22 | 3.03 | 1.23 | 19.02 | 4.21 | 2.40 | 1.15 | 1.63 | 2.25 |
| 07 | 2.56 | 2.15 | 6.43 | 3.39 | 34.16 | 9.98 | 2.67 | 1.61 | 2.61 | 1.08 |
| 09 | 2.54 | 0.90 | 5.05 | 1.90 | 5.76 | 1.05 | 2.86 | 1.14 | 5.43 | 2.27 |
| Avg. | 3.21 | 1.70 | 6.08 | 2.54 | 17.38 | 4.24 | 2.72 | 1.25 | 3.66 | 2.01 |