Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;10(2):153. doi: 10.3390/biology10020153

Table 2.

Combination of BZ with CFZ against B16-F1 cell growth in MTT assay in vitro.

Drug Cell Viability (Fa) a Parameters b CI c DRI d Comments
BZ (nM) CFZ (nM) m Dm r BZ CFZ
5 - 0.772 –2.029 8.397 –0.979
10 - 0.334
20 - 0.169
- 5 0.937 –2.002 18.91 –0.999
- 10 0.769
- 20 0.481
5 5 0.376 –1.058 5.263 –0.926 0.669 2.16 4.87 Moderate synergism, favorable dose-reduction
10 10 0.147 0.720 2.00 4.55
20 20 0.122 1.295 1.11 2.53 Antagonism, no dose- reduction for BZ but favorable for CFZ
Simulation
0.05 1.703 0.84 1.94 Antagonism
No or not favorable dose-reduction for BZ but favorable for CFZ
0.10 1.216 1.18 2.70
0.25 0.742 1.94 4.40 Slight synergism, favorable dose-reduction
0.50 0.453 3.19 7.19 Moderate synergism, favorable dose-reduction
0.75 0.276 5.24 11.7 High synergism, favorable dose-reduction
0.90 0.168 8.62 19.1
0.95 0.120 12.1 26.7

This table is formed from the output results generated by CompuSyn Report. a. Dose and data for growth inhibition effect (Fa) were obtained from the MTT assay (average value of quadruplicate) and applied to CompuSyn analysis. b. Parameters were derived from the median-effect equation and plot. The m value is slope; Dm is IC50 for BZ or CFZ; and r is linear correlation coefficient. c. Combination index (CI) was calculated from the CI equation algorithms using CompuSyn software. CI = 1, CI < 1, and CI > 1 indicate additive effect, synergism, and antagonism, respectively. d. Dose-reduction index (DRI) was calculated from the DRI equation and algorithm using CompuSyn software. DRI = 1, DRI > 1, and DRI < 1 indicate no dose-reduction, favorable dose-reduction, and not favorable dose-reduction, respectively, for each drug in the combination.