Table 5.
Reference Correlations and Primary Data Sets for the Saturated Liquid Dynamic Viscosity of n-C6H14, n-C8H18, n-C10H22, and n-C16H34 Used for Comparison with the SLS Measurements
1st author | year of publication |
technique employeda |
100Ur | number of data points |
AADb / % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-C6H14 | |||||
Reference correlation | |||||
Michailidou46 | 2013 | 0.5 | |||
Primary data | |||||
Oliveira47 | 1992 | VW | 0.5–2.4 | 3 | 0.2 |
Assael48 | 1991 | VW | 0.5 | 1 | 0.7 |
Berstad49 | 1989 | OCup | 1.15 | 6 | 1.0 |
Knapstad50 | 1989 | OCup | 0.33–0.56 | 7 | 0.3 |
Grigor’ev51 | 1988 | Cap | 0.9c | 4 | 0.7 |
Bauer52 | 1984 | Cap | 0.3 | 4 | 0.6 |
Dymond53 | 1980 | Cap | 0.5 | 12 | 0.7 |
Dymond54 | 1980 | FB | 2 | 4 | 1.5 |
Agaev55 | 1963 | Cap | 1-3c | 21 | 1.6 |
n-C8H18 | |||||
Reference correlation | |||||
Huber13 | 2004 | 0.8 | |||
Primary data | |||||
Dymond53 | 1980 | Cap | 0.5 | 8 | 0.8 |
Badalyan56 | 1986 | Cap | 1 | 10 | 2.0 |
Knapstad50 | 1989 | OCup | 0.33–0.56 | 5 | 0.5 |
Keramidi57 | 1991 | Cap | 1–3d | 6 | 3.2 |
Oliveira47 | 1992 | VW | 0.5–2.4 | 3 | 0.4 |
Harris58 | 1997 | FB | 2 | 5 | 0.4 |
Caudwell59 | 2009 | VW | 2 | 4 | 0.7 |
n-C10H22 | |||||
Reference correlation | |||||
Huber13 | 2004 | 1.6 | |||
Primary data | |||||
Dymond60 | 1981 | Cap | 0.5 | 8 | 0.5 |
Knapstad50 | 1989 | OCup | 0.33–0.56 | 11 | 0.5 |
Assael61 | 1992 | VW | 0.5 | 6 | 0.5 |
Oliveira47 | 1992 | VW | 0.5–2.4 | 3 | 0.7 |
Caudwell59 | 2009 | VW | 2 | 4 | 0.2 |
n-C16H34 | |||||
Reference correlation | |||||
Meng14 | 2018 | 0.9 | |||
Primary data | |||||
Nederbragt62 | 1947 | Cap | N/Ae | 5 | 1.0 |
Dymond53 | 1980 | Cap | 0.5 | 4 | 0.4 |
Dymond54 | 1980 | FB | 2 | 10 | 0.5 |
Wakefield63 | 1987 | Cap | 0.5 | 3 | 0.5 |
Wakefield64 | 1988 | Cap | 0.5 | 2 | 0.2 |
Tanaka65 | 1991 | TC | 2 | 3 | 1.1 |
Wu66 | 1998 | Cap | 0.1 | 4 | 1.0 |
Cap, Capillary viscometer; FB, Falling body viscometer; OCup, Oscillating cup viscometer; TC, Torsional crystal viscometer; VW, Vibrating wire viscometer.
Absolute average deviation between the literature data set and eq 2
Uncertainties taken from Reference 46
Uncertainties taken from Reference 13
Uncertainties are not specified