Abstract
Infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been associated with leukopenia and uncontrolled inflammatory response in critically ill patients. A better comprehension of SARS-CoV-2-induced monocyte death is essential for the identification of therapies capable to control the hyper-inflammation and reduce viral replication in patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Here, we show that SARS-CoV-2 engages inflammasome and triggers pyroptosis in human monocytes, experimentally infected, and from patients under intensive care. Pyroptosis associated with caspase-1 activation, IL-1ß production, gasdermin D cleavage, and enhanced pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in human primary monocytes. At least in part, our results originally describe mechanisms by which monocytes, a central cellular component recruited from peripheral blood to respiratory tract, succumb to control severe COVID-19.
Subject terms: Viral infection, Inflammasome
Introduction
Severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), emerged in China, causing a major public health burden in decades. Although patients with severe COVID-19 may present an asymptomatic/mild disease, others experience acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) characterized by elevated serum levels of proinflammatory mediators—the cytokine storm1–3. Patients with severe COVID-19, monocytes/macrophages may be the main source of uncontrolled levels of the pro-inflammatory mediators TNF-α and IL-6 in the respiratory tract in peripheral blood4. Plasmatic levels of IL-6 have been associated with mortality, intensive care admission and hospitalization, representing a poor prognostic factor for COVID-195. The uncontrolled inflammation triggered by SARS-CoV-2 occurs 7 to 10 days after onset of illness and associates with decreased viral loads6,7.
In severe COVID-19, the cytokine storm associates with high levels of tissue insult, judged by increased levels lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and D-dimer in the plasma6–8. Moreover, high LDH levels and leukopenia in severe COVID-19 points out that white cells loses the integrity of plasma membrane8–11. Among these cells, monocytes should orchestrate the equilibrium between innate and adaptative immune responses, which may be presumably affected during cytokine storm. The leukopenia of patients with severe COVID-19 seem to precede the cytokine storm11,12. Moreover, in other virus-induced cytokine storm episodes in the respiratory tract, such as induced by influenza A virus, monocytes and macrophages are severely affected13–16.
There are various mechanisms involved in lytic cell death, which are differently engaged from development to responses to infection17. For certain diseases, such as COVID-19, in which the immunopathogenesis mechanisms associate with poor clinical outcomes, controlling the way cells collapse to infection is vital for the host17. Lytic cell death may be triggered by pyroptosis or necroptosis, in monocytes/macrophages this phenomenon exacerbates inflammation, because of release of intracellular damage-associated molecular patterns18,19. Pyroptosis is a caspase-1-dependent event that leads to gasdermin D (GSDMD) pore formation20. Necroptosis depends on intracellular signaling of receptor-interacting protein kinases (RIPK) and mixed lineage kinase domain-like phosphorylation to form membrane pores20. Thus, we hypothesized that the monocyte cell death induced by SARS-COV-2 exacerbates the production of inflammatory cytokines, as well as impairs the immune balance in the hosts. In fact, we found that SARS-CoV-2 engages inflammasomes and pyroptosis in human monocytes, by experimental or natural infection. These events were associated with caspase-1 activation, IL-1ß production, GSDMD cleavage and dysregulation of cytokine release. Finally, we show that inhibition of early steps of SARS-CoV-2 life cycle by atazanavir (ATV) could block pyroptosis in SARS-CoV-2-infected human primary monocytes.
Results
Lytic cell death in SARS-CoV-2-infected human primary monocytes
For initial assessments of SARS-CoV-2-induced monocyte death, we quantified the LDH activity in the culture supernatant and annexinV/propidium iodide (PI) labeling through flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. SARS-CoV-2 increased LDH levels similarly to the positive control, LPS + ATP (Fig. 1A). SARS-CoV-2 was as potent as LPS + ATP to increase PI+ cells by 300-fold and PI+/annexinV+ cells by 200-fold (Fig. 1B). Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy also reconfirm plasma membrane disruption triggered by SARS-CoV-2 in a similar magnitude to the positive control (Fig. 1B–E). These data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce lytic cell death in human primary monocytes.
Inflammasome engagement and pyroptotic events in SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes
Severe COVID-19 was associated with inflammasome activation21. Indeed, we observed that glyburide, which prevents NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) activation22, abolished SARS-CoV-2-dependent monocyte lytic death (Fig. 2A). Next, we measured caspase-1 activation, a downstream event to inflammasome engagement20. SARS-CoV-2 induced pro-caspase-1 cleavage, similarly to LPS + ATP, by western blotting and flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 2B, C). Apoptotic caspases-3/-7 were not upregulated in SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes (Fig. 2F, G).
Caspase-1 activation is known to trigger IL-1β production and GSDMD cleavage20–24. Indeed, SARS-CoV-2 infection increased IL-1β production, which was prevented by selective inhibition of capase-1 (AC-YVAD-CMK) or by treatment with pan-caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD-FMK) (Fig. 2H). Impairment of NLPR3, by glyburide, also prevented SARS-CoV-2-induced IL-1β production (Fig. 2H). RIPK inhibition by necrostatin could not prevent significantly IL-1β production (Fig. 2H).
Based on the pharmacological characterization, SARS-CoV-2 depends on cellular components associated with pyroposis to promote lytic monocyte death. We thus measured the cleaved GSDMD as a proxy of the pore forming structure. In fact, SARS-CoV-2, similarly to LPS + ATP, enhanced cleaved GSDMD levels (Fig. 2I). Importantly, inhibition of IL-1R engagement reduced SARS-CoV-2-mediated caspase-1 activation and cell lysis (Fig. S1A, B), suggesting that inflammasome-dependent IL-1β secretion amplify caspase-1 activation and pyroptosis in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Inflammasome activation amplify pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion in infected monocytes
We subsequently quantified the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, in SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes upon pharmacological treatment to block inflammasome and pyroptosis. Inhibition of caspase-1, NLP3, and IL-1 receptor prevented SARS-CoV-2-induced enhancement of IL-6 and TNF-α levels (Fig. 3A, B). In addition, inhibition of IL-1 receptor engagement also reduced SARS-CoV-2-dependent production of IL-1 β (Fig. S1C). Moreover, IL-8 production, which is independent of inflammasome engagement and pyroptosis, was only modulated by pan-caspase inhibition in SARS-CoV-2-infeced monocytes (Fig. S2).
ATV prevented SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammasome-engagement and pyroptosis
Since lytic cell death in monocytes may depend on SARS-CoV-2 replication, we tested whether orally available generic antivirals could prevent these events. Flow cytometry analysis of SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes treated with ATV demonstrated a significant reduction in caspase-1 activity (Fig. 4A, B). Other orally available repurposed anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs, such as lopinavir (LPV) and ribavirin (RBV), did not affect SARS-CoV-2-induced caspase-1 activation (Fig. 4C). Moreover, treatments with ATV did not alter the activity of caspase-1, -3 and -7 in monocytes exposed to LPS + ATP (Fig. S3), indicating a specific antiviral activity of this drug. Consistently, treatment with ATV also reduced the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes, when compared to the untreated cells (Fig. 4D–F). ATV did not interfere with the production of IL-8, which is independent of virus-induced inflammasome engagement (Fig. 4G). Consistently, lower levels of LDH were detected in the supernatants of SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes treated with ATV, when compared to infected and untreated cells (Fig. 4H). Since ATV inhibits the early proteolytic processing of viral antigens, an early event during SARS-CoV-2 replication, this drug represented the most upstream process pharmacologically inhibited in this investigation to prevent lytic monocyte death.
Caspase 1- activation, lytic monocyte death, and Il-1β associate with severe COVID-19
To clinically validate our findings, we evaluated if monocytes obtained from critically ill patients with COVID-19 would also display signals of pyroptosis-like caspase-1-dependent cell death. We observed that monocytes from COVID-19 patients had increased caspase-1 activation (Fig. 5A, B) and significantly higher lytic death, by PI+ staining, when compared to monocytes from healthy donors (HD) (Fig. 5C, D). Corroborating with our in vitro data, we also detected higher levels of IL-1β in the plasma of critically ill patients, compared to HD (Fig. 5E). Therefore, the in vitro results from the previous sections stand on the shoulders of the clinical relevance of monocytes in patients with severe COVID-19.
Discussion
COVID-19 has caused in over 100,000 deaths/month worldwide21 and represent the major public health crisis of the beginning of 21st century, leading to an unpredictable impact in global economics25,26. SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers an uncontrolled inflammatory response and marked leukopenia with consequent lung/respiratory dysfunction27,28. Similarly, to other respiratory viruses29–31, SARS-CoV-2 induces a cytokine storm, characterized by an uncontrolled inflammatory response mediated by monocytes/macrophages, when they should orchestrate the antiviral immune response32. In this work, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 engages inflammasome, with subsequent caspase-1 activation, increase IL-1ß levels and GSDMD pore formation in human primary monocytes, pointing toward a pyroptotic cell death. This deleterious immune dysregulation loop triggered by SARS-CoV-2 may be impaired by ATV, glyburide and the blockage of the IL-1 receptor.
Our results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 leads to an intense cell death in human primary monocytes, observed by the increase in LDH release in infected cultures, as well as by the higher number of PI+ cells when compared to uninfected controls, both in experimental infection and in patients with severe COVID-19. Pyroptosis is an inflammatory and lytic programmed cell death triggered after inflammasome engagement18–20, it has been demonstrated that NLRP3 inflammasome activation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) associated with severe COVID-1921. We confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers NLRP3 inflammasome engagement in monocytes, because glyburide, a drug for treatment of type 2 diabetes which modulates ATP-dependent K+ channel22, could prevent virus-induced cell lysis. Next, we further demonstrated that downstream events could be prevented by early inhibition of virus replication, at protein translation levels, by ATV. Conversely, inhibition of viral RNA synthesis, by RBV did not affect cell death. Based on analogy with SARS-CoV from 2002, late viral proteins E, Orf3, and Orf8, which are synthetized after RNA synthesis, have been implicated in inflammasome activation33. Thus, it likely that other nonstructural proteins (nsp) from SARS-CoV-2 can affect intracellular K+ imbalance to trigger NLRP3. Among the possible SARS-CoV-2 proteins, nsp6 may affect K+ channels34.
Moreover, activation of caspase-1, increased production of IL-1ß and GSDMD pore was documented here in SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes, points towards pyroptotic cell death These in vitro results are in accordance with the literature and with our finding described here that indicate the formation of inflammasomes in patients with severe COVID-1935. We also showed that the release of IL-1ß could be promoted by the activation of inflammasomes during the SARS-CoV-2 infection, because blockage of IL-1ß receptors reduced caspase-1 activation and cell death. These results corroborate with studies showing that the increase in IL-1ß production is associated with severe COVID-1936–43. Under our experimental conditions, the increase in IL-1ß precedes the unbalanced IL-6 release. These information should not be neglected when considering biopharmaceuticals to tackle cytokine storm in severe COVID-19.
To establish the clinical relevance of SARS-CoV-2-induced pyroptosis in monocytes44,45, we analyzed peripheral monocytes isolated from patients with severe COVID-19. We found that the cells from the patients displayed higher caspase-1 activation, when compared with monocytes isolated from HD. Recent clinical data reveal high levels of LDH and consistent leukopenia in critically ill COVID-19 patients6,7,35,42–46. Our data also demonstrate intense monocyte death in COVID-19 patients, as detected through flow cytometry analyzes. Altogether, these data suggest that the severity of COVID-19 may be associated with inflammasome activation in monocytes that results in large amounts of IL-1ß and generates an excessive inflammatory response, further characterized by high levels of IL-6 and TNF-α. Consistently, treatment inhibition of IL-1 receptor has been associated with clinical and inflammatory improvements in critically ill COVID-19 patients42. These results are in line with clinical case reports that demonstrate that monocytes/macrophages are key cells in the deleterious pro-inflammatory events that characterize the most serious cases of COVID-1947–49.
In this work, we originally describe that infection by SARS-CoV-2 can engage inflammasome activation and pyroptotic cell death, which may be related to the intense leukopenia and exacerbated inflammation seen in severe cases of the COVID-19. Since there is no specific therapy for this disease, our results point out that ATV has a promising therapeutic potential against SARS-CoV-2-induced cell death.
Material and methods
Reagents
ATV and RBV were received as donations from Instituto de Tecnologia de Fármacos (Farmanguinhos, Fiocruz). The antiviral LPV/ritonavir (4:1 proportion) was pruchased from AbbVie (Ludwingshafen, Germany). ELISA assays were purchased from R&D Bioscience. Lipopolysacchadides—LPS, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the specific inhibitor of caspase-1 (AC-YVAD-CMK), pan-caspase inhibitor (ZVAD-FMK), RIPK1 (Necrostatin-1—Nec-1), IL-1 receptor (IL-1RA) and glyburide were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All small molecule inhibitors were dissolved in 100 % dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and subsequently diluted at least 104-fold in culture or reaction medium before each assay. The final DMSO concentrations showed no cytotoxicity. The materials for cell culture were purchased from Thermo Scientific Life Sciences (Grand Island, NY), unless otherwise mentioned.
Cells and virus
African green monkey kidney (Vero, subtype E6) cells were cultured in DMEM high glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, Utah) and 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (P/S). Vero cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Human primary monocytes were obtained through plastic adherence of PBMCs, which were obtained from buffy coat preparations of HDs by density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll–Paque, GE Healthcare). In brief, PBMCs (2.0 × 106 cells) were plated onto 48-well plates (NalgeNunc) in RPMI-1640 without serum for 2–4 h; then, non-adherent cells were removed by washing and the remaining monocytes were maintained in DMEM with 5% human serum (HS; Millipore) and penicillin/streptomycin.
SARS-CoV-2 was isolated and expanded on Vero E6 cells from a nasopharyngeal swab of a confirmed case from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Experiments were performed after one passage in cell culture, when Vero E6 cells with DMEM plus 2% FBS in 150 cm2 flasks were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cytopathic effect was observed daily and peaked 4–5 days after infection. All procedures related to virus culture were handled at biosafety level 3 (BSL3) multiuser facility, according to WHO guidelines. Virus titers were determined as the tissue culture infectious dose at 50% (TCID50/mL). Virus stocks were kept in −80 °C ultralow freezers. The virus strain was sequenced to confirm the virus identity and its complete genome is publicly deposited (GenBank accession No. MT710714).
Yield-reduction assay
Human primary monocytes were infected with multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 at density of 2–8 × 105 cells/well in 48-well culture plates, depending on the total cell number from each donor. After 1 h at 37 °C, cells were washed, and various concentrations of compounds were added in DMEM with 2% FBS. After 48 h, the supernatants were harvested and virus replication was quantified by real time RT-PCR and infectious titers by TCID50/mL.
Virus titration
Monolayers of Vero cells (2 × 104 cell/well) in 96-well culture plates were infected with log-based dilutions of the supernatants containing SARS-CoV-2 for 1 h at 37 °C. The cells were washed and fresh medium with 2% FBS was added. After 3–5 days, the cytopathic effects were scored in at least ten replicates per dilution by independent readers, who were blind with respect to source of the supernatant. Reed and Muench scoring method was employed to determine TCID50/mL.
Flow cytometer analysis
For flow cytometry analysis, monocytes were diluted in labeling buffer (106 cells/mL). Then, 100 µL of cell samples were marked with 5 µL of AnnexinV and PI for 15 min for cell death evaluation. Around 10,000 gated events were acquired using FACSCalibur and the analysis was performed using the CellQuest software. Monocytes were gated through cell size (foward light scatter) and granularity (side light scatter) analysis.
Human monocytes were stained for caspase‐1 activity with FAM‐YVAD‐FMK (fluorescent‐labeled inhibitor of caspase‐1 [FLICA] and FAM-FLICA Caspase-3/7 activity or HLA-DR APC.H7 or IgG APC.H7. Caspase-1 and caspase-3/7 activity was determined via flow cytometry (FACSCalibur) by detecting FLICA fluorescence and expression of HLA-DR as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) value for each sample. Acquisition of data was set to count a total of 10,000 events, and the FLOWJO software package was used to analyze the data.
Microscopic analysis
Human primary monocytes were plated on glass coverslips at density of 2–8 × 105 cells/well in 48-well plates. Infection was performed for 2 h at 37 °C and then fresh medium with 2% FBS was added. After 24 h, the cells were washed with Binding buffer and stained with PI (0.5 µg/mL) for 5 min. Next, the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (1 µg/mL) for 5 min and the coverslips were mounted using an antifade mounting medium (VECTASHIELD). Fluorescence was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy with an ×100 objective lens (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Measurements inflammatory mediators and cell death marker
The levels of IL-1ß, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and LDH were quantified in the culture supernatants from infected and uninfected monocytes using ELISA kits, according to the manufacturer’s intructions (R&D System).
Extracellular LDH was quantified using Doles® kit according to manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, cell culture supernatants were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 1 min, to remove cellular debris, and then 25 μL were placed into 96-well plates and incubated with 5 μL of ferric alum and 100 μL of LDH substrate for 3 min at 37 °C. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidized form) was added followed by the addition of a stabilizing solution. After 10 min, the reaction was read in a spectrophotometer at 492 nm.
Western blot assay
Cellular extracts of 1 × 106 cells were homogenized in the RIPA lysis buffer in the presence of proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and the protein levels were measured by bicinchoninic acid assay protein assay kit. A total of 20 μg of protein was loaded onto a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel for separation by electrophoresis and the protein bands were then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (ImmobilonP-SQ, Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% albumin diluted in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% of Tween 20 for 2 h at room temperature and incubated with the specific primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology), to detect pro-caspase-1 and cleaved-caspase-1, after overnight incubation at 4 °C. After washing, membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (IRDye® 800CW Goat-anti-Mouse and IRDye® 680LT Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Antibody, LI-COR, Lincoln) for 30 min at RT. The protein bands were visualized by digital fluorescence (Odyssey® CLx Imaging System), and protein density was analyzed by the ImageJ software. All the data were normalized by β-actin expression quantification.
Human subjects
We prospectively enrolled severe COVID19 RT-PCR-confirmed cases, as well as SARS-CoV-2-negative healthy controls. Blood samples were obtained from 12 patients with severe COVID-19 within 72 h from intensive care unit admission in two reference centers (Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer and Hospital Copa Star, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Severe COVID-19 was defined as critically ill patients presenting viral pneumonia on computed tomography scan and in mechanical ventilation. All patients had SARSCoV-2 confirmed diagnostic through RT-PCR of nasal swab or tracheal aspirates. Peripheral vein blood was also collected from eight SARS-CoV-2-negative healthy control participants as tested by RT-PCR on the day of blood sampling. The characteristics of severe (n = 12), and control (n = 8) participants are presented in Table 1. Severe COVID-19 patients usually present older age and higher prevalence of comorbidities as obesity, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes as in previously reported patient cohorts. In the present study, the SARS-CoV-2-negative control group was designed to include subjects of older age and chronic non-communicable diseases, so it is matched with critically ill COVID-19 patients (Table 1). Patients with ARDS were managed with neuromuscular blockade and a protective ventilation strategy that included low tidal volume (6 mL/kg of predicted body weight) and limited driving pressure (less than 16 cm H2O) as well as optimal PEEP calculated based on the best lung compliance and PaO2/FiO2 ratio. In those with severe ARDS and PaO2/FiO2 ratio below 150 despite optimal ventilatory settings, prone position was initiated. Our management protocol included antithrombotic prophylaxis with enoxaparin 40–60 mg per day. Patients did not receive routine steroids, antivirals, or other anti-inflammatory or anti-platelet drugs. The SARS-CoV-2-negative control participants were not under anti-inflammatory or anti-platelet drugs for at least 2 weeks. All clinical information were prospectively collected using a standardized form—ISARIC/WHO Clinical Characterization Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections (CCPBR).
Table 1.
Characteristicsa | Control (n = 8) | Covid-19 (n = 9) |
---|---|---|
Age, years | 52.6 (47–60) | 61 (33–79) |
Sex, male | 8 (100%) | 6 (66.7%) |
Respiratory support | ||
Oxygen supplementation | 0 (0%) | 3 (33.3%) |
Mechanical ventilation | 0 (0%) | 6 (66.7%) |
SAPS 3 | 59.25 (31–75) | |
PaO2/FiO2 ratio | – | 210.75 (87–509.5) |
Vasopressor | – | 3 (33.3%) |
Time from symptom onset to blood sample, days | – | 10 (6–18) |
Status on Jun 30th | ||
Dead | – | 5 (55.55%) |
Discharged | – | 1 (11.1%) |
Hospitalized | – | 3 (33.3%) |
Comorbidities | ||
Obesity | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) |
Hypertension | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) |
Diabetes | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Cancer | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Chronic heart diseaseb | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Presenting symptoms | ||
Cough | 0 (0%) | 3 (33,3%) |
Fever | 0 (0%) | 3 (33,3%) |
Dyspnea | 0 (0%) | 4 (44,4%) |
Headache | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Anosmia | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Laboratory findings on admission | ||
Lymphocyte count, cells/mm3 | – | 1355.8 (552–2564) |
Platelet count, ×1000/mm3 | – | 169.6 (92–278) |
Leukocytes | – | 8036 (8.03–18,670) |
C reactive protein, mg/L | – | 14.78 (0.1–30.8) |
aNumerical variables are represented as the median and the max range, and qualitative variables are represented as the number and the percentage.
bCoronary artery disease or congestive heart failure
Ethics statement
Experimental procedures involving human cells from HDs were performed with samples obtained after written informed consent and were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation/Fiocruz (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) under the number 397-07. The National Review Board approved the study protocol (CONEP 30650420.4.1001.0008), and informed consent was obtained from all participants or patients’ representatives.
Statistical analysis
The assays were performed in blinded way. They were performed by one professional, codified and read by another fellow. All experiments were carried out at least six independent times, including a minimum of two technical replicates in each assay. The equations to fit the best curve were generated based on R2 values ≥ 0.9. Student’s t test was used to access statistically significant P values < 0.05.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the Hemotherapy Service from Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for providing buffy-coats. This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Inova Fiocruz, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Mercosur Fund for Structural Convergence (FOCEM, Mercosur, grant number 03/11) granted for Thiago Moreno L. Souza, Patrícia T. Bozza, Fernando A. Bozza, and Dumith Chequer Bou-Habib.
Funding
Funding was also provided by CNPq, CAPES, and FAPERJ through the National Institutes of Science and Technology Program (INCT) to Carlos Morel (INCT-IDPN) and to Wilson Savino (INCT-NIM). Thanks are due to Oswaldo Cruz Foundation/Fiocruz under the auspicious of Inova program. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the paper, and in the decision to publish the results.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Edited by Ivano Amelio
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: André C. Ferreira, Vinicius Cardoso Soares
Change history
5/19/2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41420-021-00477-1
Contributor Information
André C. Ferreira, Email: tmoreno@cdts.fiocruz.br
Thiago Moreno L. Souza, Email: andre.bio2009@gmail.com
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41420-021-00428-w.
References
- 1.Conti P, et al. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by COVID-19: anti-inflammatory strategies. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34:327–331. doi: 10.23812/CONTI-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Long B, Brady WJ, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020;38:1504–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li J, Fan JG. Characteristics and mechanism of liver injury in 2019 coronavirus disease. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2020;28:13–17. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:992–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Du RH, et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV- 2: a prospective cohort study. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;55:2000524. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00524-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou F, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wölfel R, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581:465–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang J, Jiang M, Chen X, Montaner LJ. Cytokine storm and leukocyte changes in mild versus severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: review of 3939 COVID-19 patients in China and emerging pathogenesis and therapy concepts. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020;108:17–41. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3COVR0520-272R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen Z, John, Wherry E. T cell responses in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:529–536. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0402-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu Z, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Han Y, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase, an independent risk factor of severe COVID19 patients: a retrospective and observational study. Aging. 2020;12:11.245–11.258. doi: 10.18632/aging.103372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Terpos E, et al. Hematological findings and complications of COVID-19. Am. J. Hematol. 2020;95:834–847. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Woo PCY, et al. Cytokine profiles induced by the novel swine-origin influenza A/H1N1 virus: Implications for treatment strategies. J. Infect. Dis. 2010;201:346–53. doi: 10.1086/649785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li YX, et al. Characteristicsof peripheral blood leukocyte differential counts in patients with COVID-19. Zhonghuanei Ke Za Zhi. 2020;59:E003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ding X, et al. Dynamic profile and clinical implications of hematological parameters in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020;58:1365–1371. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Singh A, Sood N, Narang V, Goyal A. Morphology of COVID-19-affected cells in peripheral blood film. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e236117. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Danthi P. Viruses and the diversity of cell death. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016;3:533–553. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jorgensen I, Miao EA. Pyroptotic cell death defends against intracellular pathogens. Immunol. Rev. 2015;265:130–42. doi: 10.1111/imr.12287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Man SM, Karki R, Kanneganti TD. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases. Immunol. Rev. 2017;277:61–75. doi: 10.1111/imr.12534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Frank D, Vince J. Pyroptosis versus necroptosis: similarities, differences, and crosstalk. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:99–114. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0212-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rodrigues TS, et al. Inflammasomes are activated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with COVID-19 severity in patients. J. Exp. Med. 2020;218:3 e20201707. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mangan MSJ, et al. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:588–606. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zalinger ZB, Elliott R, Weiss SR. Role of the inflammasome-related cytokines Il-1 and Il-18 during infection with murine coronavirus. J. Neurovirol. 2017;23:845–854. doi: 10.1007/s13365-017-0574-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Franchi L, Eigenbrod T, Muñoz-Planillo R, Nuñez G. The inflammasome: a caspase-1-activation platform that regulates immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:241–7. doi: 10.1038/ni.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.OPAS. COVID-19 (doença causada pelo novo coronavírus). Folha Inf. Print in https://www.paho.org/pt/covid19 (2020).
- 26.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:533–534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wissel BD, et al. An interactive online dashboard for tracking COVID-19 in U.S. counties, cities, and states in real time. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2020;27:1121–1125. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lucas C, et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2020;584:463–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:363–374. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0311-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Teijaro JR. The role of cytokine responses during influenza virus pathogenesis and potential therapeutic options. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014;386:3–22. doi: 10.1007/82_2014_411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Szretter KJ, et al. Role of host cytokine responses in the pathogenesis of avian H5N1 influenza viruses in mice. J. Virol. 2007;81:2736–44. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02336-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Peschke T, Bender A, Nain M, Gemsa D. Role of macrophage cytokines in influenza A virus infections. Immunobiology. 1993;89:340–55. doi: 10.1016/s0171-2985(11)80365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yap JKY, Moriyama M, Iwasaki A. Inflammasomes and pyroptosis as therapeutic targets for COVID-19. J. Immunol. 2020;3:ji2000513. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gordon DE, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583:459–468. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jamilloux Y, et al. Should we stimulate or suppress immune responses in COVID-19? Cytokine and anti-cytokine interventions. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020;9:102567. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zheng Z, et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2020;81:e16–e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abbasifard M, Khorramdelazad H. The bio-mission of interleukin-6 in the pathogenesis of COVID-19: a brief look at potential therapeutic tactics. Life Sci. 2020;257:118097. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yao Z, Zheng Z, Wu K, Zheng J. Immune environment modulation in pneumonia patients caused by coronavirus: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Aging. 2020;12:7639–7651. doi: 10.18632/aging.103101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang Y, et al. Analysis of serum cytokines in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:4410–5. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4410-4415.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ong EZ, et al. A Dynamic immune response shapes COVID-19 progression. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:879–882.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laing, A. G., et al. A dynamic COVID-19 immune signature includes associations with poor prognosis. Nat. Med. 10.1038/s41591-020-1038-6 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 42.Yan L, et al. An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020;2:283–288. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cauchois R, et al. Early IL-1 receptor blockade in severe inflammatory respiratory failure complicating COVID-19. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:18951–18953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009017117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Qin C, et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:762–768. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McGonagle D, Sharif K, O’Regan A, Bridgewood C. The role of cytokines including interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced pneumonia and macrophage activation syndrome-like disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020;19:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Merad M, Martin JC. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:448. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0331-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Park MD. Macrophages: a Trojan horse in COVID-19? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:351. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fintelman-Rodrigues N, et al. Atazanavir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e00825–20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00825-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hantoushzadeh S, Norooznezhad AH. Possible cause of inflammatory storm and septic shock in patients diagnosed with (COVID-19) Arch. Med. Res. 2020;51:347–348. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.