TABLE 2.
Emax and EC50 values of fixed-proportion agonist/antagonist mixtures in ligand-modulated [35S]GTPγS binding
Emax, EC50, and Hill coefficient values are derived from the concentration-effect curves shown in Fig. 3. Fixed-proportion concentration ratios are expressed as X:1 agonist/antagonist, which are fentanyl/naltrexone (F/N) in MOR-expressing cells and CP55,940/rimonabant (C/R) in CB1R-expressing cells. Emax values are expressed as a percentage of the stimulation produced by a maximally effective concentration (%Max) of a full agonist at each receptor type (DAMGO for MOR and WIN55,212-2 for CB1R). EC50 values for agonist alone and all mixtures are expressed as log M agonist concentration along with conversion to [nanomolar] concentration, whereas EC50 values listed for each antagonist alone represent the log M EC50 [nanomolar] concentration of the antagonist. For mixtures, the antagonist concentration at the EC50 value can be calculated as EC50 ÷ fixed-proportion dose ratio of agonist to antagonist. All values are means ± S.E.M. (MOR n = 4; CB1 n = 3–6). Emax or log EC50 values without any overlapping letter designations (within each receptor type) are P < 0.05 different from each other by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.
Receptor | Mixture | Emax (%Max) | EC50 (log M) | Hill Coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|
nM | ||||
MOR | Fentanyl | 100.1 ± 3.3a | −7.35 ± 0.01a [44.6] | 1.00 ± 0.03 |
MOR | 965 F:1 N | 91.3 ± 0.8ab | −7.42 ± 0.05ab [39.4] | 0.98 ± 0.03 |
MOR | 322 F:1 N | 85.5 ± 2.8b | −7.45 ± 0.02ab [35.5] | 1.01 ± 0.03 |
MOR | 107 F:1 N | 71.7 ± 1.6c | −7.46 ± 0.03ab [35.4] | 0.96 ± 0.06 |
MOR | 35.8 F:1 N | 38.7 ± 4.2d | −7.61 ± 0.07ab [25.6] | 0.82 ± 0.06 |
MOR | 11.9 F:1 N | 25.8 ± 2.5de | −7.57 ± 0.04ab [27.6] | 0.77 ± 0.11 |
MOR | 3.97 F:1 N | 15.0 ± 1.2ef | −7.72 ± 0.11b [21.9] | 0.72 ± 0.05a |
MOR | Naltrexone | 5.2 ± 0.3f | −9.56 ± 0.10c [0.29] | 0.83 ± 0.11 |
CB1R | CP55,940 | 93.3 ± 5.1a | −8.48 ± 0.05a [3.44] | 0.99 ± 0.10 |
CB1R | 128 C:1 R | 97.0 ± 1.0a | −8.73 ± 0.11a [2.24] | 1.00 ± 0.09 |
CB1R | 42.7 C:1 R | 90.9 ± 5.9a | −8.61 ± 0.17a [3.76] | 0.88 ± 0.04 |
CB1R | 14.2 C:1 R | 62.6 ± 3.1b | −8.72 ± 0.11a [2.23] | 0.96 ± 0.09 |
CB1R | 4.75 C:1 R | 33.2 ± 2.5c | −8.85 ± 0.17a [2.16] | 1.11 ± 0.22 |
CB1R | 1.59 C:1 R | 8.1 ± 1.0d | −9.20 ± 0.36a [1.76] | 0.69 ± 0.15 |
CB1R | 0.526 C:1 R | −16.1 ± 3.4e | −10.3 ± 0.22b [0.09] | 2.29 ± 0.49 |
CB1R | Rimonabant | −31.5 ± 2.2e | −9.20 ± 0.10a [0.72] | 0.89 ± 0.11 |
aa-e Emax or log EC50 values without any overlapping letter designations (within each receptor type) are P < 0.05 different from each other by ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. aHill coefficient is P < 0.05 different from one by Student’s t test.