Table 2.
Demographic data and treatment information. Abbreviations. N = number; % = percentage.
| Authors | Number of patients | Age (mean) | FemaleN (%) | Male N (%) | Type of Fracture | Cement injected (ml) | Follow-up (months) | IntraoperativeComplications | Complications requiring additional surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dall’Oca et al.32 | 35 | 85.4 | 24 (68.6%) | 11 (31.4%) | AO 31-A2, A3 | 3 | 12 | 1 little amount of cement was extravasated into the hip joint | none |
| Kammerlander et al.20 | 59 | 84.5 | 45 (76.3%) | 14 (24.7%) | AO 31-A1, A2, A3 | 4.2 | 4 | 1 perforation of the k-wire into the hip joint | none |
| Kammerlander et al.19 | 62 | 85.3 | 49 (79.0%) | 13 (21.0%) | AO 31-A1, A2, A3 | 3.8 | 15.3 | 3 open reduction, 2 treated with subtrochanteric cerclage wires | none |
| Kammerlander et al.30 | 105 | 86.1 | 87 (82.8%) | 18 (17.2%) | AO 31-A2, A3 | 3.8 | 12 | 1 cement leakage | none |
| Kim et al.31 | 40 | 81.6 | 25 (62.5%) | 15 (37.5%) | AO 31-A2, A3 | 5 | 12 | 2 superficial wound infection | none |