A. Mechanical failure |
A.1. Type 1A failure- instability after limb salvage surgery |
Procedure
|
No. of Patients
|
a. Proximal femur endoprosthesis |
2 |
b. Proximal humerus endoprosthesis/nail cement spacer |
0 |
c. Pelvis reconstruction |
0 |
d. Proximal tibia endoprosthesis |
0 |
e. Others |
0 |
Total
|
2/116 (1.72%)
|
A.2. Type 1A failure- extension lag after proximal tibia endoprosthesis
|
a. No. of patients/total (%) without any lag (or with full active extension) |
31/39 (79.5%) |
b. No. of patients/total (%) with lag |
8/39 (20.51%) |
c. Mean extension lag (range) |
2.31° (0–20°) |
d. Mean flexion (range)
|
94.1° (70–110°)
|
B. Biological failure |
B.1. Type 1B-failure of coverage after limb salvage surgery
|
Procedure
|
No. of Patients
|
a. Proximal femur endoprosthesis |
3 |
b. Proximal tibia endoprosthesis |
8 |
c. Proximal humerus endoprosthesis/nail cement spacer |
0 |
d. Pelvis reconstruction |
1 |
e. Others |
0 |
Total
|
12/116 (10.3%)
|
B.2. Type 4 failure- deep infection after limb salvage surgery |
Procedure
|
No. of Patients
|
a. Proximal femur endoprosthesis |
1 |
b. Proximal tibia endoprosthesis |
0 |
c. Proximal humerus endoprosthesis/nail cement spacer |
0 |
d. Pelvis reconstruction |
2 |
e. Others |
1 |
Total |
4/116 (3.45%) |