Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;16:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.029

Table 1.

Complications noted including mechanical and biological failure.

A. Mechanical failure
A.1. Type 1A failure- instability after limb salvage surgery
Procedure
No. of Patients
a. Proximal femur endoprosthesis 2
b. Proximal humerus endoprosthesis/nail cement spacer 0
c. Pelvis reconstruction 0
d. Proximal tibia endoprosthesis 0
e. Others 0
Total
2/116 (1.72%)
A.2. Type 1A failure- extension lag after proximal tibia endoprosthesis
a. No. of patients/total (%) without any lag (or with full active extension) 31/39 (79.5%)
b. No. of patients/total (%) with lag 8/39 (20.51%)
c. Mean extension lag (range) 2.31° (0–20°)
d. Mean flexion (range)
94.1° (70–110°)
B. Biological failure
B.1. Type 1B-failure of coverage after limb salvage surgery
Procedure
No. of Patients
a. Proximal femur endoprosthesis 3
b. Proximal tibia endoprosthesis 8
c. Proximal humerus endoprosthesis/nail cement spacer 0
d. Pelvis reconstruction 1
e. Others 0
Total
12/116 (10.3%)
B.2. Type 4 failure- deep infection after limb salvage surgery
Procedure
No. of Patients
a. Proximal femur endoprosthesis 1
b. Proximal tibia endoprosthesis 0
c. Proximal humerus endoprosthesis/nail cement spacer 0
d. Pelvis reconstruction 2
e. Others 1
Total 4/116 (3.45%)