Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;13(2):640. doi: 10.3390/nu13020640

Table 1.

Summary of the included studies. In all studies, specific IgE to Cor a 1, Cor a 8, Cor a 9, and Cor a 14 was measured. DBPCFCF = double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge.

Summary of the Included Studies
Oral Food Challenge
Author, Country,
Year
Study
Population
Age (years)
M/F
Lower limit IgE Positive Test
(kUA/L)
Participants (%) Number
Positive (%)
Beyer,
Germany, 2015 [30]
143 children with suspected hazelnut allergy
Age (median, quartile) Tolerant 4.7 (2.1–8.1) Allergic 4.3 (2.2–6.1)
−98/45
0.10 143 (100%) of which 46/143 (32%) DBPCFCF 99 (69%)
Brandström, Sweden, 2015 [31] 40 children referred for oral challenge for hazelnut allergy suspicion Age (median, range) 11 (6–18)
23/17
0.10 40 (100%) DBPCFC 8 (20%)
Buyuktiryaki, Turkey, 2016 [32] 64 children with hazelnut allergy to determine resolution of hazelnut allergy Age (median, interquartile) 3.4 (2.1–7.2)
45/19
0.10 56 (87.5%) DBPCFC
8 not performed because of anaphylaxis within the last 12 months
24 (42%)
Eller,
Denmark, 2016 [33]
155 children with suspected hazelnut allergy Age 5.1 (0.7–15.5)
100/55
0.35 140 (90%) open challenge
15 DBPCFC
65 (41%)
Grabenhenrich,
Germany, 2016 [16]
142 children with suspected hazelnut allergy Age (median, interquartile) 4.5 (2.1–7.6)
97/45
>0 142 (100%) open, single blind, double blind challenge. 44 (31%)
Inoue,
Japan, 2019 [35]
91 children sensitized to hazelnut Age (median, interquartile) 7.3 (5.9–10.5)
63/28
0.35 91 (100%) open food challenge 9 (9%)
Kattan,
US,
2014 [34]
33 children with clinical impression of hazelnut allergy
9 children with history of objective symptoms with hazelnut ingestion
- 0.10 33 (78%) open challenge
9 not performed because of a history of objective symptoms with ingestion of hazelnut
4 (12%)
Masthoff, Netherlands,
2013 [29]
81 children Retrospective equally powered groups with positive/negative challenge Age (median, interquartile) 8 (7–12)
54/27
0.35 81 (100%) DBPCFC 40 (49%)