Table 1.
Summary of the Included Studies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oral Food Challenge | |||||
Author, Country, Year |
Study Population |
Age (years) M/F |
Lower limit IgE Positive Test (kUA/L) |
Participants (%) | Number Positive (%) |
Beyer, Germany, 2015 [30] |
143 children with suspected hazelnut allergy |
Age (median, quartile) Tolerant 4.7 (2.1–8.1) Allergic 4.3 (2.2–6.1) −98/45 |
0.10 | 143 (100%) of which 46/143 (32%) DBPCFCF | 99 (69%) |
Brandström, Sweden, 2015 [31] | 40 children referred for oral challenge for hazelnut allergy suspicion | Age (median, range) 11 (6–18) 23/17 |
0.10 | 40 (100%) DBPCFC | 8 (20%) |
Buyuktiryaki, Turkey, 2016 [32] | 64 children with hazelnut allergy to determine resolution of hazelnut allergy | Age (median, interquartile) 3.4 (2.1–7.2) 45/19 |
0.10 | 56 (87.5%) DBPCFC 8 not performed because of anaphylaxis within the last 12 months |
24 (42%) |
Eller, Denmark, 2016 [33] |
155 children with suspected hazelnut allergy | Age 5.1 (0.7–15.5) 100/55 |
0.35 | 140 (90%) open challenge 15 DBPCFC |
65 (41%) |
Grabenhenrich, Germany, 2016 [16] |
142 children with suspected hazelnut allergy | Age (median, interquartile) 4.5 (2.1–7.6) 97/45 |
>0 | 142 (100%) open, single blind, double blind challenge. | 44 (31%) |
Inoue, Japan, 2019 [35] |
91 children sensitized to hazelnut | Age (median, interquartile) 7.3 (5.9–10.5) 63/28 |
0.35 | 91 (100%) open food challenge | 9 (9%) |
Kattan, US, 2014 [34] |
33 children with clinical impression of hazelnut allergy 9 children with history of objective symptoms with hazelnut ingestion |
- | 0.10 | 33 (78%) open challenge 9 not performed because of a history of objective symptoms with ingestion of hazelnut |
4 (12%) |
Masthoff, Netherlands, 2013 [29] |
81 children Retrospective equally powered groups with positive/negative challenge | Age (median, interquartile) 8 (7–12) 54/27 |
0.35 | 81 (100%) DBPCFC | 40 (49%) |