Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247839

Table 9. Accuracy of models proposed by the literature.

Paper 2 classes 3 classes
Sedik et al. (2020) [37] 99.00% -
Haque and Abdelgawad (2020) [38] 98.30% -
Minaee et al. (2020) [40] 92.29% -
Narin, Kaya, and Pamuk (2020) [41] 98.00% -
Wang et al. (2020) [42] 99.33% -
Hemdan, Shouman and Karar (2020) [43] 90.00% -
Horry et al. (2020) [44] 87.87% -
Abbas, Abdelsamea, and Gaber (2020) [45] - 95.12%
Khan, Shah and Bhat (2020) [46] 99.00% 89.60%
Ozturk et al. (2020) [47] 98.08% 87.02%
Loey, Smarandache and Khalifa (2020) [48] 100.00% 81.48%
Apostolopoulos and Mpesiana (2020) [49] 96.78% 94.72%
Wang, Lin and Wong (2020) [50] 98.30% 95.00%
Ucar and Korkmaz (2020) [51] 99.78% 98.30%
Our inflated model 98.56% 98.33%
Our proposed model 98.19% 91.21%