Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar;27(3):719–727. doi: 10.3201/eid2703.204090

Table 1. Characteristics of the studies, number of participants, and pool size used in a systematic review of pooling sputum as an efficient method for Xpert MTB/RIF and Ultra testing for tuberculosis during the coronavirus disease pandemic*.

Study Country Participants recruited from No. samples Culture GX cartridge used Pooling
ratio No. pools GX-pos,†
no. (%) GX-neg,†
no. (%) RIF- pos, no. Comments
(11) South Africa Reference
laboratory 100 Yes MTB/RIF 1:5 20 20 (20.6) 80 (79.4) 5 Culture and SM pos



85


1:5
17
17 (20)
68 (32)
3
Culture pos/SM neg
(12)
Nigeria
OPD
729
No
MTB/RIF
1:4
185‡
115 (15.8)
614 (84.2)
4
Compared active and passive case finding
(13) Vietnam SS 118 No MTB/RIF 1:2 16 75 (63.6) 43 (36.4) NR None
1:4 16
1:6 16
1:8 16
1:10 16






1:12
16




(14)
Vietnam
Hospitals
262
No
MTB/RIF
1:2
101§
99 (37.7)
163 (62.3)
NR
Pools constructed 1 pos/1 neg
(15) Cambodia ACF 584 No ULTRA 1:4 125 91 (15.6) 493 (84.4) 3 Used chest radiograph to screen






1:3
28



(10) Brazil Prisons, SS 1,120 Yes ULTRA 1:4 20 100 (8.9) 1,020 (91.1) NR None
1:8 20
1:12 20
1:16 40

*Xpert MTB/RIF and Ultra, Cepheid (https://www.cepheid.com). ACF, active case finding; GX, GeneXpert; hosp, hospitalized patients; neg, negative; NR, not reported; OPD, outpatient department; pos, positive; RIF, rifampin; SM, smear; SS, spiked samples.

†Single tests.

‡3 had failed results.

§2 had failed results.