Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 25;100(4):100943. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.040

Table 4.

Effects of GOD on intestinal pH of Beijing You Chickens under different housing systems.

Items pH
42 d
77 d
Duodenum Jejunum Ileum Duodenum Jejunum Ileum
FB1 5.56 5.26 6.17 5.42 5.39 6.64
FG 5.47 5.19 5.41 5.47 5.11 5.90
CB 5.55 5.31 6.07 5.48 5.43 7.26
CG 5.60 5.30 5.50 5.42 5.36 6.86
SEM 0.021 0.026 0.148 0.016 0.044 0.115
Main effect Litter floor 5.51 5.23 5.79 5.44 5.25 6.27b
Cage 5.58 5.30 5.78 5.45 5.39 7.06a
Basal 5.56 5.28 6.12a 5.45 5.41a 6.95a
GOD 5.54 5.25 5.45b 5.44 5.24b 6.38b
P value Housing systems 0.123 0.146 0.983 0.889 0.091 <0.001
GOD 0.629 0.480 0.028 0.826 0.041 0.001
Housing systems × GOD 0.098 0.573 0.749 0.061 0.189 0.302

a–bMeans in the same column without the same superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05). “+” means add. SEM means standard error of the mean. (n = 8).

Abbreviations: CB, rear in the cage fed with basal dietary; CG, rear in the cage fed with GOD; FG, rear on the litter floor fed with GOD dietary; GOD, glucose oxidase.

1

FB, rear on the litter floor fed with basal dietary.