Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;9(2):549–557. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00225-y

Table 2.

Radiographic evaluation and compliance data: differences between groups (Group-A vs Group-B)

All
(Mean ± SD)
Group-A
45° ≤ TKT0 < 60°
(Mean ± SD)
Group-B
60° ≤ TKT0 ≤ 75°
(Mean ± SD)
p
TKT0 61.9 ± 11.2 55.7 ± 4.5 66.3 ± 7.9 0.003*
TKT1 (in-brace) 37.5 ± 9.1 35.8 ± 5.6 39.3 ± 8.3 0.087
TKT2 38.9 ± 7.3 37.8 ± 6.2 41.5 ± 6.8 0.0625
TKT3 41.7 ± 4.4 40.3 ± 7.6 43.3 ± 5.3 0.0923
ΔTK 19.5 ± 5.8 15.5 ± 4.8 23.1 ± 3.6 0.021*
In-brace TK% 37.4% 35.1% 40.7% 0.01§
TK%T3 31.6% 27.7% 34.7% 0.005§
Compliant patients (%) 84.9% 76.3% 90.5% 0.022§
Curve reduction: ΔTK ≤  − 5° (%) 116 (60.4%) 45 (59.2%) 71(61.2%) 0.526
Curve stabilization: − 5° < ΔTK < 5 (%) 57 (29.7%) 24 (31.6%) 33 (28.5%) 0.065
Curve progression: ΔTK ≥ 5° (%) 19 (9.9%) 7 (9.2%) 12 (10.4%) 0.773

*Significant p value (unpaired t test)

§Significant p value (Chi-square test)