Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 28;72(5):1617–1633. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa553

Table 4.

Summary of the genome-wide association study for pod shattering in the BC4/F4 IL population

Phenotyping approach Shattering trait Sample size
(no. of ILs)
Ch Associated SNPs (n) Genomic region Three best-associated SNPs
Shattering occurrence
Sh y/n Dehiscent versus indehiscent 1183 Pv 05 52 38322754–39384267 S5_38611412 (4.35E-30)
S5_38792327 (6.71E-24)
S5_39120955 (1.03E-27)
Sh y/n Dehiscent versus indehiscent (only accurate phenotypic scores) 1165 Pv 05 54 38322754–39384267 S5_38611412 (3.21E-27)
S5_38792327 (5.06E-25)
S5_39120955 (2.7E-27)
Sh y/n All classes (dehiscent, intermediate, indehiscent) 1196 Pv 05 52 38322754–39384267 S5_38611412 (1.32E-31)
S5_38792327 (5.77E-25)
S5_39120955 (5.04E-27)
Field Dehiscent versus indehiscent 1192 Pv 05 38 38322754–39182106 S5_38611085 (9.10E-20)
S5_38611412 (2.73E-23)
S5_38611464 (5.34E-19)
Post-harvest Putative dehiscent versus putative indehiscent 1165 Pv 05 43 38322754–39379952 S5_38611085 (2.82E-27)
S5_38611412 (2.79E-30)
S5_38612876 (1.23E-26)
Shattering modulation
Post-harvest Quantitative (all classes) 1192 Pv 05 20 38348010–39120955 S5_38611412 (1.05E-15)
S5_38611464 (5.43E-14)
S5_38612876 (5.27E-15)
Field % Twisting pods/plant 1002 Pv 05 7 38611085–38792327 S5_38611412 (3.51E-10)
S5_38612876 (4.63E-08)
S5_38792327 (4.77E-08)