Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;15:625232. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.625232

TABLE 2.

Differences in ALFF under slow-4 and slow-5 bands among CN, SCD, naMCI, and aMCI.

Brain regions (aal) Peak MNI coordinate F/T-values Cluster size (mm3)

x y z
Slow-4 ANCOVA
L lingual gyrus −27 −72 −3 0.117 1512
R lingual gyrus 12 −90 −15 9.087 2646
R middle frontal gyrus 57 18 33 6.876 1539
R superior parietal lobule 27 −66 63 0.133 1890
L superior frontal gyrus −12 48 42 4.646 2943
R superior frontal gyrus 36 0 36 3.465 5859
CN vs. SCD
R lingual gyrus 6 −90 −15 –4.076 324
CN vs. naMCI
R superior frontal gyrus 21 −15 60 –6.766 324
CN vs. aMCI
R middle frontal gyrus 51 30 30 4.418 1107
L superior frontal gyrus −18 48 36 3.350 432
naMCI vs. aMCI
L lingual gyrus −3 −93 −6 3.898 297
Slow-5 ANCOVA
R superior frontal gyrus 27 60 −6 6.964 3267
R middle frontal gyrus 30 18 48 6.885 2187
L superior parietal lobule/L precuneus −24 −48 66 10.854 2889
CN vs. aMCI
R middle frontal gyrus 36 57 6 3.409 378
SCD vs. aMCI
R superior frontal gyrus 30 18 48 4.114 1404
naMCI vs. aMCI
L superior parietal lobule/L precuneus −24 −48 66 5.298 1863

All significant results were presented in control of age, gender, and educational level with p < 0.05. TFCE-FWE correction was applied for voxel-wised two-sample T-test. To note, cluster size was set over 1,350 mm3 in ANCOVA analyses and over 270 mm3 in two-sample T-tests. CN, normal control; SCD, subjective cognitive decline; naMCI, non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; AAL, anatomical automatic labeling; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; R, right; L, left.