Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;19:9. doi: 10.4103/jcar.JCar_11_20

Table 2.

Histomorphological characteristics of KRAS+versus KRAS−cases

Histomorphological characteristics KRAS positive(n=28), n(%) KRAS negative(n=72), n(%) P

Cellular arrangement
Solid
 Present 12(42.86) 28(38.89) 0.716
 Absent 16(57.14) 44(61.11)
Acinar
 Present 18(64.29) 36(50) 0.198
 Absent 10(35.71) 36(50)
Papillary/micropapillary
 Present 3(10.71) 12(16.67) 0.454
 Absent 25(89.29) 60(83.33)
Lepidic
 Present 5(17.86) 7(9.72) 0.265
 Absent 23(82.14) 65(90.28)
Singly scattered/loose clusters
 Present 21(75) 61(84.72) 0.255
 Absent 7(25) 11(15.28)
Nuclear pleomorphism
 Mild 8(28.57) 11(15.28) 0.128
 Moderate orsevere 20(71.43) 61(84.72)
Tumor differentiation
 Well 8(28.57) 8(11.11) 0.065
 Moderate 11(39.29) 43(59.72)
 Poor 9(32.14) 21(29.16)
Mucin(extracellular or intracytoplasmic)
 Present 9(32.14) 10(13.89) 0.036*
 Absent 19(67.86) 62(86.11)
Necrosis
 Present 16(57.14) 29(40.28) 0.127
 Absent 12(42.86) 43(59.72)

KRAS: Kirsten rat sarcoma virus