Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):1937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041937

Table 5.

Cross-sectional regression analyses for life satisfaction.

Model Predictors Life Satisfaction (Wave 1) Life Satisfaction (Wave 2)
β t Cohen’s f2 R2 Change F Change β t Cohen’s f2 R2 Change F Change
1 Age −0.07 −3.68 *** 0.005 0.014 12.43 *** −0.03 −1.62 0.001 0.011 9.65 ***
Gender a −0.07 −3.73 *** 0.005 −0.09 −4.42 *** 0.008
Family intactness b −0.07 −3.34 *** 0.004 −0.05 −2.72 ** 0.003
2 CBC 0.51 29.82 *** 0.338 0.253 889.31 *** 0.44 24.86 *** 0.237 0.192 618.23 ***
PA 0.48 27.55 *** 0.289 0.224 758.81 *** 0.44 24.71 *** 0.234 0.190 610.59 ***
GPYD 0.60 38.21 *** 0.553 0.356 1459.64 *** 0.58 35.88 *** 0.491 0.329 1287.62 ***
PIT 0.55 33.44 *** 0.425 0.298 1118.14 *** 0.56 34.09 *** 0.444 0.308 1162.41 ***
TPYD 0.61 39.38 *** 0.587 0.370 1550.97 *** 0.58 36.05 *** 0.495 0.331 1299.26 ***

Note. In model 2, control variables were statistically controlled, and predictors were included in the model separately; measures of positive youth development at Wave 1 and Wave 2 were included as predictors to predict internet addiction at Wave 1 and Wave 2, respectively. a 1 = boy, 2 = girl; b 1 = intact, 2 = non-intact; CBC = cognitive-behavioral competence; PA = prosocial attribute; GPYD = general positive youth development; PIT = positive identity; TPYD = mean of total positive youth development. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.