Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):1937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041937

Table 6.

Longitudinal regression analyses for life satisfaction.

Model Predictors Life Satisfaction (Wave 2) Life Satisfaction (Wave 2)
β t Cohen’s f2 R2 Change F Change β t Cohen’s f2 R2 Change F Change
1 Age −0.03 −1.62 0.001 0.011 9.65 *** 0.00 −0.19 0.000 0.137 412.76 ***
Gender a −0.09 −4.42 *** 0.008 −0.06 −3.32 *** 0.004
Family intactness b −0.05 −2.72 ** 0.003 −0.03 −1.58 0.001
W1 LS 0.37 20.32 *** 0.159
2 CBC 0.21 10.64 *** 0.043 0.042 113.12 *** 0.02 0.93 0.000 0.000 0.87
PA 0.18 9.33 *** 0.033 0.032 87.08 *** 0.00 −0.08 0.000 0.000 0.01
GPYD 0.27 14.38 *** 0.079 0.073 206.83 *** 0.07 3.11 ** 0.003 0.003 9.67 **
PIT 0.24 12.56 *** 0.061 0.057 157.83 *** 0.05 2.14 * 0.002 0.002 4.6 *
TPYD 0.27 13.99 *** 0.075 0.070 195.86 *** 0.06 2.37 * 0.002 0.002 5.64 *

Note. In model 2, control variables were statistically controlled, and predictors measured at Wave 1 were included in the model separately. a 1 = boy, 2 = girl; b 1 = intact, 2 = non-intact; CBC = cognitive behavioral competence; PA = prosocial attribute; GPYD = general positive youth development; PIT = positive identity; TPYD = mean of total positive youth development; LS = life satisfaction. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.