Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 14;10(1):76–83. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0491

Table 3.

Percentage (95% CI) positive agreement between the macimorelin GHST and the ITT at different cutpoints among participants with a positive finding for each ITT cutpoint.

Macimorelin cutpoint, ng/mL ITT cutpoint, ng/mL
2.8 (n = 62/140) 4.0 (n = 67/140) 5.1 (n = 74/140) 6.5 (n = 82/140)
2.8 87.1% (76.2–94.3%) 80.6% (69.1–89.2%) 74.3% (62.8–83.8%) 68.3% (57.1–78.1%)
4.0 88.7% (78.1–95.3%) 82.1% (70.8–90.4%) 78.4% (67.3–87.1%) 72.0% (60.9–81.3%)
5.1 90.3% (80.1–96.4%) 86.6% (76.0–93.7%) 82.4% (71.8–90.3%) 75.6% (64.9–84.4%)
6.5 93.6% (84.3–98.2%) 89.6% (79.7–95.7%) 87.8% (78.2–94.3%) 81.7% (71.6–89.4%)

Results in italics are based on using the same cutpoints for macimorelin and the ITT. n = number of participants with a positive finding using the specified ITT cutpoint.

GHST, growth hormone stimulation test; ITT, insulin tolerance test.