Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 20;10(2):315. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020315

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of Hfra and Yfh1 on the Cu2+- and Fe3+-catalyzed degradation rate of AA. (A) Time-dependent AA (70 μM) degradation at 25 °C measured by the decrease in its absorbance at 265 nm when AA was alone (), in presence of Cu2+ (2.5 μM) (), in the presence of Cu2+ (2.5 μM) and Yfh1 (0.5 μM) (), in the presence of Cu2+ (2.5 μM) and Yfh1 (1 μM) (), in the presence of Cu2+ (2.5 μM) and Yfh1 (2.5 μM) (), and in the presence of Cu2+ (2.5 μM) and Hfra (10 μM) (▲). (B) Time-dependent AA (70 μM) degradation at 25 °C measured by the decrease in its absorbance at 265 nm when AA was alone (), in presence of Fe3+ (2.5 μM) (), in the presence of Fe3+ (2.5 μM) and Yfh1 (0.5 μM) (), and in the presence of Fe3+ (2.5 μM) and Hfra (10 μM) (▲). In both panels, the data points are the mean from all the replicas, and the error bars represent standard deviation from the different independent measurements.