Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;14:66. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00902-5

Table 2.

Assessing the impact of recontact and disclosure (n = 10 participants)

Per-person comprehension of resultsa (% answered correctly) 82% (26%) 20–100%
 Name of participant’s condition 8 (80%)
 Name of gene associated with condition 9 (90%)
 Type of inheritance pattern 6 (60%)
 Inheritance risk to biological siblings 9 (90%)
 Inheritance risk to children 9 (90%)
Letter satisfactionb 4.2 (0.7) 3.0–5.0
 Information about research pathogenic variant 4.1 (0.8) 3.0–5.0
 Family member implications 4.4 (0.5) 4.0–5.0
 Resources provided 4.1 (0.8) 3.0–5.0
 Letter length 4.2 (0.7) 3.0–5.0
 Readability of letter 4.1 (0.8) 3.0–5.0
Genetic counseling satisfactionb 4.4 (0.4) 3.3–5.0
 Empathy demonstrated 4.7 (0.7) 3.0–5.0
 Facilitated the decision-making process 4.7 (0.5) 4.0–5.0
 Reassured 3.7 (0.8) 2.0–5.0
 Appointment duration 4.0 (0.7) 3.0–5.0
 Concern demonstrated 4.7 (0.5) 4.0–5.0
 Appointment was valuable 4.5 (0.7) 3.0–5.0
Psychological response (FACToR score)
 Psychological distressc 16.0 (4.2) 7.0–21.0
 Negative feelings 3.7 ± 3.4 0.0–12.0
 Uncertainty 2.0 ± 1.7 0.0–5.0
 Privacy concerns 1.7 ± 2.0 0.0–5.0
 Positive feelings 8.7 ± 3.8 0.0–12.0
Decisional satisfaction and regret
 Regretc 11.5 (11.6) 0.0–25.0
 Information sharingd 9 (90%)
 Spouse or partner 4 (40%)
 Children 4 (40%)
 Siblings 4 (40%)
 Physician/cardiologist 3 (30%)
 Parents 2 (20%)
 Other (i.e., relatives, friends, etc.) 3 (30%)

Data Presented as mean (SD) for continuous data, n (%) for categorical data, and range

FACToR Scale Feelings About genomiC Testing Result

aIndicates the percent answered correctly for the 5 comprehension questions (total 41, out of 50)

bMeasured on a scaled from 0 to 5 with 5 being very satisfied or strongly agree

cMeasured on a scale from 0 to 100 with 100 being high psychological distress or high decisional regret

dParticipants were allowed to select more than one answer for Information Sharing