Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jun 5;73(8):1135–1149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820923944

Table 6.

Relative fixations to phonological and semantic competitors by words and sounds

Fixed Effects Estimate SE df t p
Phonological Competitors
(Intercept) 0.03 0.02 7.90 1.30 1.000
Linear −0.12 0.15 7.80 −0.79 1.000
Quadratic −0.31 0.09 7.90 −3.45 .098
Cubic 0.14 0.10 8.00 1.41 1.000
Quartic 0.15 0.06 7.70 2.44 .334
AuditoryInput 0.00 0.01 658.40 −0.09 1.000
Linear:AudIn 0.08 0.05 654.40 1.59 .786
Quad:AudIn 0.27 0.05 661.30 5.06 < .001 ***
Cubic:AudIn 0.16 0.05 655.90 2.98 .042 *
Quartic:AudIn −0.15 0.05 650.10 −2.87 .051
Semantic Competitors
(Intercept) 0.06 0.02 10.00 3.57 .076
Linear 0.11 0.07 9.50 1.56 1.000
Quadratic −0.05 0.15 9.70 −0.32 1.000
Cubic 0.00 0.06 9.00 −0.05 1.000
Quartic 0.01 0.07 9.30 0.09 1.000
AuditoryInput 0.02 0.01 807.90 3.27 .018 *
Linear:AudIn −0.01 0.04 810.10 −0.34 1.000
Quad:AudIn −0.18 0.04 808.30 −4.73 < .001 ***
Cubic:AudIn 0.03 0.04 814.70 0.71 1.000
Quartic:AudIn 0.13 0.04 810.60 3.28 .018 *

Note. See Appendix Tables B3 and B4 for full model outputs including effects of Identification Time. The contrasts for Auditory-input were centered (sound: −.5, word: +.5), and t-tests used the Satterthwaite approximation for degrees of freedom with Holm-Bonferroni-adjusted p-values.

***

p<.001

**

p<.01

*

p<.05.