Table 2.
Contour | Placement of the implant | Projection | Upper pole definition | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New technique (n = 14 patients) | 2 | 1.55 | 1.48 | 1.8 | 6.83 |
Traditional technique (n = 16 patients) | 1.01 | 1.54 | 1.5 | 1.22 | 5.27 |
Change in scores, % | +98.01 | +0.65 | −1.35 | +47.5 | +29.6 |
p < 0.05 (Student's t test) | Significant | Not significant | Not significant | Significant | Significant |