Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;147(3):e20200576. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0576

TABLE 7.

Key Outcomes for Comparison 2: ICM Versus ECC

Outcomes No. Participants (Studies) Follow-up Certainty of the Evidence Relative Effect (95% CI) RD/MD (95% CI) I2, %
Neonatal outcomes
 Survival to discharge from hospital 945 (10 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea,b,c RR: 1.02 (0.98 to 1.06) RD: 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.05) 24
 Severe IVH: ultrasound diagnosis grades III, IV 889 (10 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowd,e RR: 0.72 (0.44 to 1.19) RD: −0.02 (−0.05 to 0.01) 0
 CLD: oxygen at 36 wk PMA 685 (7 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowf,g RR: 1.02 (0.63 to 1.65) RD: −0.02 (−0.12 to 0.08) 60
 NEC (Bell’s stage ≥II or any grade47; requiring surgery) 843 (9 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea,h RR: 0.80 (0.55 to 1.18) RD: (−0.06 to 0.02) 0
 Peak Hb concentrations within the first 24 h after birth 914 (10 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatei,j Continuous outcome MD: 1.18 (0.65 to 1.71) 71
 Peak Hct within the first 24 h after birth 774 (7 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatei,j Continuous outcome MD: 3.04 (1.28 to 4.80) 69
 Peak Hb concentrations within 7 d after birth 54 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,k,l,m Continuous outcome MD: 0.60 (−0.57 to 1.77) Not estimable
 Peak Hct within 7 d after birth 54 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,k,l,m Continuous outcome MD: 1.00 (−2.32 to 4.32) Not estimable
 Hyperbilirubinemia (treated by phototherapy) 480 (5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ Higha RR: 1.04 (0.94 to 1.16) RD: 0.03 (−0.04 to 0.10) 10
Infant outcomes
 Moderate to severe neurodevelopmental impairment in early childhood 26 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very lown,o,p,q RR: 0.75 (0.21 to 2.71) RD: −0.08 (−0.42 to 0.26) Not estimable
 Cerebral palsy in early childhood 161 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝Very lown,o,p,q RR: 2.65 (0.88 to 7.97) RD: 0.08 (−0.00 to 0.17) Not estimable
 Significant mental developmental delay in early childhood 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Legal blindness in early childhood (<20/200 visual acuity) 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Hearing deficit in early childhood (aided or <60 dB on audiometric testing) 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
Maternal outcomes
 PPH (clinically estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 mL) 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Maternal death or severe morbidity 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Severe PPH (blood loss ≥1000 mL) 266 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very lowr,s RR: 2.83 (0.12 to 67.01) RD: 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.03) Not estimable
 Use of therapeutic uterotonic agents 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Blood transfusion (maternal) 66 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very lowr,t,u RR: 2.83 (0.12 to 67.01) RD: 0.03 (−0.05 to 0.11) Not estimable
 Manual removal of the placenta 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Additional treatment of PPH (uterine tamponade, embolization) 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable
 Postpartum infection 0 (0 studies) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable

CLD, chronic lung disease; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; PMA, postmenstrual age; PPH, postpartum hemorrhage; RD, risk difference; —, not applicable; ⊕, positive; ⊝, negative.

a

No downgrade despite concerns due to blinding of intervention and selective outcome reporting bias. Blinding less likely to affect this outcome. Selective outcome reporting bias less likely to affect this estimate because this is a null result. This is a borderline decision.

b

Some inconsistency, but not sufficient to downgrade. I2 = 24%.

c

Effect ranges from clinically important reduction to clinically important increase of survival. Downgrade by 1 for imprecision.

e

Effect ranges from clinically important reduction to clinically important increase. Low events and low participants. Downgrade by 2 for imprecision.

d

No downgrade despite concerns because of blinding of intervention and selective outcome reporting bias. Blinding less likely to affect this outcome. Biggest and majority of studies were blinded for outcome assessment. Selective outcome reporting bias less likely to affect this estimate because this is a null result. This is a borderline decision.

f

Effect ranges from clinically important reduction to clinically important increase. Downgrade by 1 for imprecision.

g

Moderate heterogeneity downgrade by 1 for inconsistency.

h

Wide CI and relatively low event rates. Downgrade by 1 for imprecision.

i

No downgrade despite concerns due to blinding of intervention and selective outcome reporting bias. Blinding less likely to affect this outcome. This is a borderline decision.

j

Substantial heterogeneity, all but one effect estimates point in the same direction. Downgrade by 1 for inconsistency.

k

Unable to assess inconsistency (only 1 study). No downgrade.

l

Only 1 small study, wide CI. Downgrade by 1 for imprecision.

m

Only 1 single-center study impairs generalizability. Downgrade by 1 for indirectness.

n

No downgrade despite concerns due to blinding of intervention and selective outcome reporting bias. Blinding less likely to affect this outcome. Selective outcome reporting bias less likely to affect this estimate because this is a null result. This is a borderline decision.

o

Unable to assess inconsistency (only 1 study). No downgrade.

p

Only 1 small study, low event numbers, very wide CI. Downgrade by 2 for imprecision.

q

Only 1 single-center study impairs generalizability. Downgrade by 1 for indirectness.

r

Very wide CI, only 1 event. Downgrade by 2 for imprecision.

s

All studies unblinded for intervention and outcome assessment. Subjective outcome, may have been influenced by lack of blinding. Downgrade by 1 for risk of bias.

t

No downgrade despite concerns due to blinding of intervention and selective outcome reporting bias. Blinding less likely to affect this outcome. Selective outcome reporting bias less likely to affect this estimate because this is a null result. This is a borderline decision.

u

Only 1 single-center study, this impairs generalizability. Downgrade by 1 for indirectness.