Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 20;11(2):540. doi: 10.3390/nano11020540

Table 3.

Comparison of the present study with other solid-phase extraction methods for analysis of multi-class pollutants.

Adsorbent/Method Mass of Adsorbent (mg) Analytes LOD (µg L−1) Linearity (µg L−1) Correlation Coefficient (R2) Refs.
MM-CMC/IT-SPME-HPLC-FLD N/A DANO, ENRO 0.14–0.61 0.001–5.0 0.9980 [51]
Oasis HLB-SPE-LC/MS/MS 60 Atenolol, carbamazepine 1.01–69.30 1.87–138.6 0.9669–0.9999 [52]
Carbowax 20M/FPSE/GC-MS Not indicated EP, BP 0.009–0.021 0,05–500 0.9992–0.9997 [22]
OasisHLB/ RDSE/GC-MS 40 MP, EP, PP, BP 0.02–0.15 0.06–0.44 0.9904–0.9989 [23]
Mixed mode cationic exchange cartidges (MXC) 60 MP 0.01 0.06–1122 0.9999 [1]
C18,Floracil, QuEChERS/UPLC-QqQ-MS 50 mg Beta-blockers: Atenolol, propranolol; Preservatives: BP, MP, PP; Anticonvulsant: carbamazepine 0.093–0.12 1.0–200.0 >0.95 [53]
MMPC/Cyc-Chit/HPLC-DAD 50 mg Beta-blockers: atenolol, propranolol 0.0001–0.0007 LOQ-400 0.9987–0.9991 This work
Parabens: MP, EP, PP, BP 0.0001–0.0007 LOQ-300 0.9987–0.9993
Anticonvulsant: carbamazepine 0.0003 LOQ-350 0.9989
Quinolones: DANO, LEVO, ENRO 0.00045–0.0011 LOQ-1000 0.9987–0.9990