Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;6:e277. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.277

Table 5. Comparison of participants’ satisfaction using Friedman test.

Each row corresponds to a task-performing exercise. Each cell of the row contains the results of the participants’ satisfaction level with each method for the evaluated exercise, as well as the chi-square and p-value resulting from the Friedman test. Higher satisfaction level is shaded in green and less satisfaction level in orange.

Question How good do you think is each method in order to … Median χ2 p-Value
Agg Ani Edg Mat
1e- … identify the most common type of change? 2.08 1.79 3.29 2.83 12.588 0.006
3e- … identify splits? 1.50 1.50 3.79 3.21 33.055 0.000
5e- … identify merges? 2.00 1.71 3.71 2.58 20.050 0.000
7e- … identify renaming of taxa? 2.13 1.50 3.67 2.71 21.559 0.000
8e- … identify moves? 1.54 1.88 3.83 2.75 24.295 0.000
9e- … identify new species added? 2.75 2.63 2.96 1.67 9.539 0.023
10e- … identify excluded taxa? 2.67 1.88 2.79 2.67 7.062 0.070
12-e- … identify changes to a taxon? 1.88 1.79 3.46 2.88 16.057 0.001
13- … visualize differences and similarities between two taxonomies? (Overall) 2.97 2.84 4.97 4.09 25.064 0.000