Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;6:e306. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.306

Table 5. A comparison between the classification scores obtained by the DL, HC feature fusion, and the FUSI-CAD system.

Accuracy (std)(95% Confidence Interval) AUC (std) (95% Confidence Interval) Sensitivity (std) (95% Confidence Interval) Specificity (std) (95% Confidence Interval) Precision (std) (95% Confidence Interval) F1 score (std) (95% Confidence Interval) DOR (std) (95% Confidence Interval)
DL FUSION 98.6% 1.00 0.981 0.99 0.99 0.986 4,851
(0.001) (0) (0.001) (0) (0) (0) (0)
[0.985–0.986] [1–1] [0.981–0.981] [0.99–0.99] [0.99–0.99] [0.986–0.986] [4,851–4,851]
HC FUSION 98% 0.995 0.976 0.984 0.984 0.98 2,846.455
(0.003) (0.006) (0.006) (0.006) (0.006) (0.005) (1,607.139)
[0.978–0.981] [0.992–0.997] [0.973–0.978] [0.981–0.986] [0.981–0.986] [0.977–0.983] [1,968.2–3,724.7]
FUSI-CAD 99% 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 9,801
(0.002) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
[0.988–0.991] [1–1] [0.99–0.99] [0.99–0.99] [0.99–0.99] [0.99–0.99] [9,801–9,801]

Note:

Bold values indicate the highest results.