Table 1. Comparison of commercial MES.
| Requirement | TIG authentig (KraussMaffei, 2020) | KraussMaffei MaXecution (KraussMaffei, 2020) | AURBURG Host computer system (ALS) (ARBURG, 2020) | MES HYDRA (MDPV, 2020) | SAP Manuacturing Execution (SAP, 2020) | Polmak Plastik QMaster (Polmak_Plastik, 2020) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Open for changes and addition of modules by the user (not producer) | No | No | No | No | Yes (mostly for business applications) | No |
| 2 | Compatibility with EUROMAP63, EUROMAP77, EMI | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3 | Acquisition of machine and process parameters | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 4 | Set values of machine and process parameters | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 5 | Synchronized acquisition of data from built-in and additional sensors | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| 6 | Possibility to change sampling rate | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |