Skip to main content
. 2019 May 13;5:e192. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.192

Table 1. Comparison between OLS estimator and M–Estimators.

Objective ρ(e) and weight w(e) functions of OLS solution and five different M–Estimators. For M–Estimators, error entries are standardized, i.e. divided by the scale estimator, s. Each robust variant comes with a hyperparameter c. Exemplary plots in the last column utilize the optimal hyperparameters detailed in Table 2.

Type ρ(e) w(e) w(e)
OLS 12e2 1 graphic file with name peerj-cs-05-192-i011.jpg
Cauchy c22 log1+ec2 11+ec2 graphic file with name peerj-cs-05-192-i014.jpg
Fair c2|e|c log1+|e|c 11+|e|c graphic file with name peerj-cs-05-192-i017.jpg
Huber 
if|e|cif|e|c
e22c|e|c2
1c|e|
graphic file with name peerj-cs-05-192-i018.jpg
Tukey
if|e|cif|e|>c
c2611ec23c26
1ec220
graphic file with name peerj-cs-05-192-i019.jpg
Welsch c221 expec2 expec2 graphic file with name peerj-cs-05-192-i022.jpg