Table 8. The quantitative results showing percentages improvements of the model after adding additional components to UNET (Ronneberger, Fischer & Brox, 2015) structure.
Method | ACC | DC | Sen | Sp | Pc | AUC | F1 | Sm | Eα | MAE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNET | 0.9696 | 0.7998 | 0.8052 | 0.9957 | 0.8247 | 0.9347 | 0.8154 | 0.8400 | 0.9390 | 0.0088 |
D-UNET | 0.9700 | 0.8011 | 0.8096 | 0.9966 | 0.8596 | 0.9492 | 0.8184 | 0.8528 | 0.9394 | 0.0083 |
DID-UNET | 0.9700 | 0.8023 | 0.7987 | 0.9964 | 0.8425 | 0.9549 | 0.8241 | 0.8447 | 0.9374 | 0.0084 |
ADID-UNET | 0.9701 | 0.8031 | 0.7973 | 0.9966 | 0.8476 | 0.9551 | 0.8200 | 0.8509 | 0.9449 | 0.0082 |
Improvement of D-UNET | ↑0.04% | ↑0.13% | ↑0.44% | ↑0.09% | ↑3.49% | ↑1.45% | ↑0.30% | ↑1.28% | ↑0.04% | ↓0.05% |
Improvement of DID-UNET | ↑0.04% | ↑0.25% | ↓0.65% | ↑0.07% | ↑1.78% | ↑2.02% | ↑0.87% | ↑0.47% | ↓0.16% | ↓0.04% |
Improvement of ADID-UNET | ↑0.05% | ↑0.33% | ↓0.79% | ↑0.09% | ↑2.29% | ↑2.04% | ↑0.46% | ↑1.09% | ↑0.59% | ↓0.06% |