Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis exploring potential mediators of the relationship between integration into the gay community and (1) condomless anal sex with partners whose HIV status is positive or unknown and (2) any HIV testing

	Any condomless anal sex with a partner whose HIV status is positive or unknown				Any HIV testing
	ORa (95% CIb) No mediator	OR (95% CI) Mediator: HIV knowledge	OR (95% CI) Mediator: peer judgmentalism	OR (95% CI) Mediator: sexuality-related discrimination	OR (95% CI) No mediator	OR (95% CI) Mediator: HIV knowledge
Integration into the gay community	1.8 (1.9, 3.5)	1.8 (1.02, 3.1)	1.7 (1.01, 2.8)	1.7 (0.97, 2.9)	1.7 (1.1, 2.6)	1.6 (1.01, 2.5)
Direct effect	–	1.8 (1.02, 3.1)	1.7 (1.01, 3.0)	1.7 (0.97, 2.9)	–	1.6 (1.01, 2.5)
Potential mediators
Knowledge of HIV risk	–	1.2 (0.98, 1.4)	–	–	–	1.2 (1.01, 1.3)
Peer judgmentalism towards sexual behavior	–	–	1.7 (0.9, 3.3)	–	–	–
Sexuality-related discrimination	–	–	–	1.2 (0.9, 1.5)
Indirect effect	–	1.1 (0.99, 1.3)	1.1 (0.99, 1.3)	1.1 (0.95, 1.3)	–	1.1 (1.0, 1.2)
Covariates
Age less than 25 years	1.5 (0.5, 4.3)	1.5 (0.6, 3.6)	1.6 (0.7, 3.8)	1.4 (0.6, 3.4)	0.6 (0.3, 1.3)	0.6 (0.3, 1.3)
Any university education	0.4 (0.1, 1.3)	0.4 (0.1, 1.4)	0.6 (0.2, 1.8)	0.6 (0.2, 2.0)	2.1 (0.7, 5.8)	1.6 (0.6, 4.4)
Employed	2.3 (0.9, 6.0)	2.3 (0.9, 5.9)	2.7 (1.1, 6.8)	2.8 (1.1, 7.3)	1.4 (0.6, 2.9)	1.1 (0.5, 2.4)
In a committed relationship	0.8 (0.2, 2.7)	0.8 (0.3, 2.3)	0.8 (0.3, 2.4)	0.7 (0.3, 2.2)	1.2 (0.5, 2.7)	1.3 (0.5, 3.1)

^aOR odds ratio

^bCI confidence interval