Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 2;11:4962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84370-y

Table 2.

The results of linear mixed-effect model adjusting for IOP and CCT.

Mean estimates values Control (N = 100) SKC (N = 100) KC (N = 100) P* P#1 P#2 P#3
Max inverse radius 0.19 0.19 0.22  < 0.001 0.459  < 0.001  < 0.001
DA ratio max (2 mm) 4.85 4.86 5.47  < 0.001 0.937  < 0.001  < 0.001
Pachy slope 40.49 42.38 68.30  < 0.001 0.261  < 0.001  < 0.001
DA ratio max (1 mm) 1.63 1.65 1.69  < 0.001 0.198  < 0.001  < 0.001
ARTh 477.92 459.75 258.93  < 0.001 0.147  < 0.001  < 0.001
Integrated radius 9.65 9.74 11.51  < 0.001 0.550  < 0.001  < 0.001
SP-A1 101.99 98.99 88.77  < 0.001 0.011  < 0.001  < 0.001
CBI 0.09 0.22 0.92  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001

SKC Subclinical keratoconus, KC Keratoconus, DA Deformation amplitude, ARTh Ambrósio’s relational thickness horizontal, bIOP Biomechanical corrected intraocular pressure, SP-A1 Stiffness parameter at the first applanation, CBI Corvis biomechanical index.

*Linear mixed-effect model; #1control versus SKC; #2control versus KC; #3SKC versus KC.