Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;10:606335. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.606335

Table 3.

Studies of FIGO stage and prognosis of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative cervical cancers.

Study (Reference) Cases (HPV negative/overall) HPV testing Advanced FIGO stage (HPV negative vs. HPV positive) Lymphatic metastasis (HPV negative vs. HPV positive) DFS (HPV negative vs. HPV positive) OS (HPV negative vs. HPV positive)
Nicolas et al. (57) 21/214 PCR 91% vs. 57%, p<0.01 67% vs. 36%, p<0.01 59.8 m (95%CI 32.0–87.6 m) vs. 132.2 m (95%CI 118.6–145.8 m), p<0.01 77.0 m (95%CI 47.2–106.8 m) vs. 153.8 m (95%CI 142.0–165.6 m), p=0.01
Van der Marel et al. (58) 8/136 HC2™, PCR L1&E7 87.5% vs. 52.3%, p=0.053 37.5% vs. 17.2%, p=0.150 51.9 m (95%CI 12.2–91.7 m) vs. 109.9 m (95%CI 98.2–121.5 m), p=0.010 67.7 m (95%CI 20.0–106.9 m) vs. 108.9 m (95%CI 97.7–120.0 m), p=0.225
Feng et al. (59) 43/122 PCR (HPV 16/18) 5 year: HR=1.250 (95%CI 0.562–2.784), p=0.584
8 year: HR=1.530 (95%CI 0.697–3.362), p=0.289

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HC2, Hybrid Capture 2; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months; HR, hazard ratio; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.