. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Cerebellum. 2021 Feb;20(1):62–73. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01183-x

Table 3.

Comparison of baseline values between tasks

Dependent Variable	Condition	Comparison	Mean Ranks (positive)	Sum of Ranks (positive)	z	Sig. (2 tailed)
Median path length	V	Reinforce Mass Prac	4.00	8.00	−1.400	.161
Median path length	NV	Reinforce Mass Prac	3.33	10.00	−1.120	.263
Path length IQR	V	Reinforce Mass Prac	4.00	16.00	−0.280	.779
Path length IQR	NV	Reinforce Mass Prac	4.20	21.00	−0.420	.674
Median peak velocity	V	Reinforce Mass Prac	4.50	27.00	−1.260	.208
Median peak velocity	NV	Reinforce Mass Prac	3.83	23.00	−0.700	.484

Means were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests at alpha = .05. NV: No vision, V: vision, Reinforce: Reinforcement training task, Mass Prac: Massed practive control task. No significant differences were observed.