Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;7(1):veab006. doi: 10.1093/ve/veab006

Table 1.

Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 genomes with 1 or more 200 nt gaps (N200) by month and by sequencing platform.

Deposition period Complete genomesa Genomes with 1 or more N200b %. with 1 or more N200c Illumina totald Illumina % with N200e MinION totalf MinION % with N200g Ion Torrent totalh Ion Torrent % with N200i Method unclearj Method unclear % with N200k
1–31 January 2020 54 1 2 9 0 2 0 0 0 43 2
1–29 February 2020 126 2 2 44 0 9 0 5 0 65 4
1–31 March 2020 2,872 559 19 1,518 16 548 32 35 6 771 18
1–30 April 2020 12,411 3,745 30 4,970 38 1,286 27 264 0 5,424 26
1–31 May 2020 19,787 8,606 43 8,634 52 2,634 30 529 0 7,990 42
1–30 June 2020 21,665 8,723 40 7,043 36 3,844 35 629 2 10,149 47
1–31 July 2020 17,986 4,834 27 4,965 23 1,585 33 471 2 10,965 29
1–31 August 2020 17,276 4005 23 11,074 22 2,270 26 486 0 3,446 28
1–30 September 2020 38,227 10,611 28 22,740 23 7,973 44 580 1 6,934 28
a

Number of genomes with the annotation ‘complete’ retrieved from GISAID (https://www.gisaid.org/).

b

Genomes were sorted by the presence or absence of the sequence N200.

c

((The number of genomes with at least one N200)/total number of genomes)*100.

d

Number of genomes in GISAID for this period generated using any of the Illumina methods as noted in the GISAID ‘Sequencing technology metadata’.

e

((The number of Illumina genomes with at least one N200)/total number of genomes)*100.

f,g

Number of genomes in GISAID for this period generated using any of the MinION methods as noted in the GISAID ‘Sequencing technology metadata’ and their percentage.

h,i

Number of genomes in GISAID for this period generated using any of the Ion Torrent methods as noted in the GISAID ‘Sequencing technology metadata’ and their percentage.

j,k

Number of genomes in GISAID for this period generated using unclear methods as noted in the GISAID ‘Sequencing technology metadata’ and their percentage.