Table 2.
Key Findings and Recommendations for Institutions and COVID-19-Related Research Priorities for the Neuro-oncology Community
| Key Findings |
|---|
| Clinical trial enrollment was impacted by the pandemic. |
| In some cases, telemedicine billing support for practitioners was inadequate. |
| Some practitioners felt pressure to do in-person visits. |
| Elective surgical practice changed. |
| Perception of increased anxiety in patients. |
| Respondents expressed concerns about their emotional well-being, safety for self and family, and financial impact from the pandemic. |
| Positive aspects of pandemic-based changes: |
| Technologies applied to patient care |
| Virtual meetings among colleagues |
| Perceived increase in patient satisfaction due to decreased time and money traveling to appointments |
| Major Recommendations |
| Institutions: |
| Modify and prioritize clinical trial infrastructure to ensure access for all patients. |
| Provide support for billing education for telephone and video visits. |
| Remove pressures on providers to see patients in-person when not clinically necessary. |
| Consider support for those with children and elder care responsibilities. |
| Provide means of psychological support to staff. |
| Areas of further research: |
| Effects of modified treatment schedules, in-person visit reductions, and surgical delays on patient outcomes. |
| COVID-19 risk factors and outcomes in neuro-oncology patient population as a function of treatment; laboratory studies in disease models. |
| Impact of financial changes on productivity and provider wellness. |
| Impact of financial changes on the conduct of basic science and clinical research. |
| Burdens as a function of provider and researcher gender and other demographics. |