Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 19:dkaa563. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa563

Table 3.

Discriminatory performance of WCC and ΔCRP cut-offs for diagnosis of CAP in RFH patients

Cut-offa Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive predictive value (%) Negative predictive value (%) Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio
WCC > 8.2 79.2 58.8 24.6 94.4 1.92 0.35
WCC > 9.4 69.8 70.0 28.2 93.2 2.32 0.43
CRP > 65 84.9 33.2 17.7 92.9 1.27 0.45
CRP > 160 49.1 71.6 22.6 89.2 1.73 0.71
WCC > 8.2 AND CRP > 65 69.8 70.3 28.5 93.2 2.35 0.43
WCC > 8.2 OR CRP > 65 94.3 21.7 16.9 95.8 1.21 0.26
ΔCRP<−15 62.3 75.0 29.7 92.2 2.50 0.50
ΔCRP < 0 73.6 65.2 26.4 93.6 2.11 0.41
WCC > 8.2 AND ΔCRP < 0 62.3 80.8 35.4 92.6 3.25 0.47
WCC > 8.2 OR ΔCRP < 0 90.6 43.1 21.2 96.4 1.59 0.22

Populations included were all patients admitted >48 h for CAP (n = 53) and MR− COVID-19 (n = 313). aWCC values represent cell numbers ×106/mL. CRP values represent concentrations in mg/L.