Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;11:5046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84488-z

Table 4.

Affinities calculated by path sampling simulations.

ΔG σ ε ΔGb0
WEHI-539
 q1 16.16 0.01 0.02 −11.63
 q2 16.89 0.01 0.02 −12.21
 q3 22.44 0.01 0.02 −17.95
 q4 20.26 0.01 0.02 −16.00
 Exp −12.66
ABT-737
 q1 20.09 0.01 0.02 −15.45
 q2 20.55 0.01 0.02 −16.12
 q3 16.07 0.01 0.02 −11.56
 q4 19.11 0.01 0.02 −14.50
 Exp −12.90

Affinities were taken from the 150 ns to 250 ns range (i.e. omitting the first 150 ns of simulation and only using the final 100 ns) for the WHAM analyses described in Tables S4S11. The WHAM analyses were executed using the same parameters as the calculations used in the main text (i.e. a Δλ of 0.05 Å, a tolerance of 1e−8 and with 1000 bootstraps). ΔG is the average PMF over the final 50 bins (2.5 Å), with σ its standard deviation. ε corresponds to the average error (via bootstrapping) taken over the same range. ΔGb0 is the standard binding free energy calculated using ΔG and the corresponding sample COMs during the start and end range of the simulation following Eq. S7. The experimental (Exp) affinities (in the ΔGb0 column) were obtained from Lessene et al14.