Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 18;11:628828. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.628828

Table 2.

Misidentification and “no identification” results by two systems.

Species by ITS sequencing Autof MS 1000 Vitek MS
C. parapsilosis complex (n=479)
C. parapsilosis (384) No ID (3)
C. guilliermondii (1)
No ID (15)
C. albicans (2)
C. pelliculosa (1)
C. orthopsilosis (26) C. albicans (1) No ID (4)
C. parapsilosis (15)
C. albicans (1)
C. metapsilosis (64) 0 No ID (32)
C. parapsilosis (15)
C. orthopsilosis (5)
C. pelliculosa (1)
C. pulcherrima (2)
C. laurentii (1)
L. elongisporus (4)
P. italicum (1)
L. elongisporus (5) 0 No ID (1)
C. glabrata complex (n=95)
C. glabrata (91) C. guilliermondii (1) C. parapsilosis (1)
C. nivariensis (3) 0 No ID (2)
C. glabrata (1)
C. bracarensis (1) 0 No ID (1)
C. albicans complex (n=323)
C. albicans (322) C. parapsilosis (1)
C. tropicalis (1)
No ID (4)
C. utilis (4)
C. parapsilosis (1)
C. tropicalis (1)
C. glabrata/C. tropicalis/C. famata (1)
C. tropicalis/C. dubliniensis (1)
C. dubliniensis (1) 0 0
C. neoformans complex (n=315)
C. neoformans (305) No ID (1) No ID (6)
C. tropicalis (1)
C. parapsilosis (1)
C. gattii (10) C. neoformans (1) No ID (5)
C. neoformans (2)
C. haemulonii complex (n=16)
C. duobushaemulonii (3) 0 No ID (1)
C. haemulonii (11) 0 0
C. auris (2) 0 0