Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 8;26(3):e382–e393. doi: 10.1002/onco.13574

Table 4.

Correlation between GSIS and biomarkers (n = 63)

GSIS p value
Immune‐hot Immune‐cold
DRD status
Wild type 16 23 .03
Mutation 11 3
N/A 3 7
BRCA status
Wild type 19 23 .18
Mutation 8 3
N/A 3 7
Stromal TIL level
Low (0%–10%) 8 25 <.001
Medium (11%–59%) 16 6
High (≥60%) 5 1
N/A 1 1
TNBC molecular subtype
BL1 5 6 <.001
BL2 2 3
IM 16 0
LAR 1 6
M 0 15
MSL 1 3
UNS 5 0
pCR
Yes 20 10 .005
No a 10 23
RCB class
0/I 24 15 .009
II/III a 6 18
BluePrint
Luminal 0 2 .49
Basal 30 31
MammaPrint
H1 3 8 .19
H2 27 25
a

One immune‐cold patient progressed prior to surgery and was included in the non‐pCR RCB II/III group for analysis purposes.

Abbreviations: BL1, basal‐like 1; BL2, basal‐like 2; DRD, DNA repair defect; GSIS, GeparSixto immune signature; IM, immunomodulatory; LAR, luminal androgen receptor; M, mesenchymal; MSL, mesenchymal stem‐like; N/A, not applicable; pCR, pathological complete response; RCB, residual cancer burden; TIL, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocyte; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer; UNS, unspecified.