Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;11(4):1532–1542. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-521

Table 4. Comparison of LSMs acquired by STE between successive fibrosis stages.

Distinction S0–1 (n=35) vs. S2 (n=37) S2 (n=37) vs. S3 (n=13) S3 (n=13) vs. S4 (n=17)
Fold change 1.23 1.18 1.28
P value <0.001 0.020 0.001
AUC (95% CI) 0.74 (0.62–0.83) 0.71 (0.56–0.83) 0.78 (0.59–0.91)

Fold change was calculated as the median ratio in the compared successive fibrosis stage cohort. LSM, liver stiffness measurement; STE, sound touch elastography; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval.