Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;9(1):100294. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100294

Table 2.

Summary and surgical characteristics with complications and physical outcomes for all included studies

Authors Year Technique Sample size Follow-up time (in months) Single stage Urethral lengthening Vaginectomy Urethral plate release Buccal mucosa graft Labia minora flap Dorsal clitoral flap Labial ring flap Vaginal flap Length of neophallus (cm)
Mean (range)
Voiding while standing, n(%) Urethral fistula, n(%) Urethral stricture, n(%)
Vukadinovic et al.20 2014 Belgrade 97 30 97 97 97 97 97 97 - - - 7 (range not specified) 97 (100) 6 (6.2) 2 (2.1)
Djordjevic et al.19 2009 Belgrade 82 32 (14–69) 82 82 82 82 82 82 - - 5.7 (4–10) 82 (100) 7 (8.5) 2 (2.4)
Perovic and Djordjevic18 2003 Belgrade 22 47 (6–72) 22 22 22 22 - - 22 - - 5.7 (4–10) 22 (100) 3 (14.2) 2 (9.1)
Stojanovic et al.21 2017 Belgrade 79 44 (10–92) 79 79 79 79 79 79 - - - 6.8 (5–9.8) 79 (100) 4 (5.1) 3 (3.8)
Takamatsu and Harashina12 2009 Labial ring flap 43 7 (3 – 96) 43 43 7 - - - 43 - 2–5 (mean not specified) +VC: 5 (71.43)
No VC: 24 (66.67)
+VC: 1 (14.3)
No VC: 11 (30.6)
+VC: 1 (14.3)
No VC: 2 (28.6)
Cohanzad22 2016 Extensive 10 68 ± 15 10 2 - - - 2 - - - 8.7 (6–12) 2 (100) - -
Hage and Van Turnhout17 2006 Hage 70 96 (54–132) 70 70 70 - - 70 - - 70 - - 26 (37.1) 25 (35.7)