Table-I.
Demographic data of the patients who underwent secondary autologous Dermis Fat Implants.
| Patient No. | Age (yrs.) | Sex | Primary Diagnosis | Preoperative Diagnosis | Primary Surgery | Follow up (months) | Complications | Additional Treatment | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | M | Globe perforation/blast injury | Socket contraction | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 2 | 6.5 | F | Retinoblastoma | Socket contraction | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 3 | 9 | M | Retinoblastoma | Socket contraction | Enucleation | 12 | Fornix contraction, fat resorption | Buccal mucosa graft, re-do DFG | Failed |
| 4 | 53 | M | Childhood injury | Socket contraction | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 5 | 32 | F | Burn injury | Socket and lids contraction | Enucleation, DFG | 12 | Fornix scarring, conformer extrusion | Fornix reconstruction with Amniotic membrane graft | Failed |
| 6 | 14 | F | Retinoblastoma | Socket and lids contraction | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 7 | 53 | M | Globe perforation | Anophthalmic socket | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 8 | 5 | F | Retinoblastoma | Anophthalmic socket | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 9 | 12 | F | Globe perforation | Anophthalmic socket | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 10 | 4 | M | Retinoblastoma | Anophthalmic socket | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 11 | 28 | M | Firearm injury | Globe perforation | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |
| 12 | 38 | M | Childhood injury | Phthisical eye | Enucleation | 6 | Ø | Ø | Satisfied |